[generally]

Cboldt,

I respectfully would ask you to watch the video at the link and then tell me if you think there were no demolition charges.

A few years ago, I would have mocked anyone who was claiming what I am claiming. I would have sided with you last week. Now I seek to enlighten you. I am not asking you to believe me, but only to watch and form your own opinion.

If you do choose to watch it, I’d like you to let me know what you think.

Best to you.
God bless,
g

[Cboldt]

I appreciate your concern about my degree of enlightenment, and I respect that you've applied your knowledge, education and experience as you viewed the video that changed your mind.

I suggest that rather than we two conduct a debate here, that anybody interested just seek the hundreds of thousands of pages of material written on the subject, and after study, pick a side. Or flip a coin and pick a side, whichever method is more in line with your knowledge, education and experience.

From my point of view, that being that the government would allow the attack, whether or not the government allowed it with demolition charges, or with demolition charges and airplanes doesn't make much difference.

[Cboldt]

From my point of view, that being that the government would allow the attack, whether or not the government allowed it with demolition charges, or with demolition charges and airplanes doesn't make much difference.

... and I should add, or with airplanes alone ... ROTFL. Sorry for the unintentional bubu.