Dem. Castor from FL just did a pretty good job.
Point she made: You are tracking where we go and tracking our medical data. He tried to dodge and say that is not its primary purpose, but she objected to “primary purpose” and nailed him on it being a “non-primary” purpose.
Still I think it’s kabuki theater, but I did like that line of questioning. (Or more accurately telling him stuff.)
Doesn’t it breach all sorts of HIPPA laws when they discuss your medical history on your screen with ads and articles targeted to your diagnosis?