Posted on 04/10/2018 6:09:31 PM PDT by ransomnote
What’s My Line? Wow, was that the one where wrong guesses cost $5 and the host would say, “I’m going to turn over the rest of the cards?”
I have a family member who was an English teacher for umpteen years. She would adore this grammar discussion on semicolons and so forth. Wish she were here now, because I do not have her abilities to comment on grammar rules.
Just so I can hold up my end of the conversation, FWIW, here are some:
https://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/semicolons.asp
Your post gave me a big smile. Thanks.
What’s My Line? is a panel game show that originally ran in the United States on the CBS Television Network from 1950 to 1967, with several international versions and subsequent U.S. revivals. The game requires celebrity panelists to question a contestant in order to determine his or her occupation, i.e., “line [of work],” with panelists being called on to identify a weekly celebrity “mystery guest” with specificity.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What%27s_My_Line%3F
You can watch (original segments) on youtube. It’s hilarious to see some of the ‘mystery’ guests.
Thanks for the Rose Garden pix!
Interesting - RR at WH today.
Discernment is all Im requesting.
************************************************************
I think there is plenty of discernment. In fitting a puzzle together, some are obvious fits. Others are put aside as not likely, so laid aside, but not necessarily forgotten.
I think I did make it clear, that I didn’t buy Cooper’s theory, at this point. Additional evidence could change my mind. So that piece of information is in the NOT LIKELY box. However, some of these people are sick, so I don’t rule it out totally, until more evidence comes to light.
After all, the holocaust did happen, and the weather underground thought they would have to kill 25 million people, because they could not be re-educated.
We did actually bring Nazis into our intelligence and scientific communities. MK Ultra - a nutty conspiracy that any discerning person rejected as false-turned out to be true.
If you have discerned that all these shootings are just a coincidence, and the official narrative is 100% true, I’m sure that puts your mind at ease. Myself, I think they are suspicious.
I have been studying and reading about these people for nearly 50 years. So I share what I have run across and leave it to any one reading to use their own research and discernment.
If you find my posts so objectionable, I would suggest you skip reading them, and quit your put-downs.
Love that quote.
*sigh* only 400 posts behind.
Glad to know Rusty. She’s so plain speaking. I follow her often.
Perhaps it’s a Brit “me members” and the attendees are o the team...
I like “grey” because it’s a cool grey. “Gray” is a warm grey and I don’t like the looks of warm grays.
I wish we were all there in the white house discussing Q.
That’s a scary thought. I wish I could say that was absurd. However, with this group, I am increasingly coming to feel that any thing is possible.
Going to have to make some exceptions! Soon to be released James Comey book most certainly should be classified as fiction.
Yes, could be.
From reddit just now:
So Snowden is manipulating the algorithms to help us acquire hidden info?
u/Formyfiveinjesusname
Im new to this so please if Im making a fool of myself tell me gently. If I understand whats going on here its like this
-Q drops some key words, questions for us to read, research so we have some idea how deep we have to go
-Q tells us which platforms to research fb, ig, etc. to find the info on the subjects provided
-they have the algorithms so Q tells us when Snowden is going to manipulate that algorithm and says start, when to stop end
-we use that window between start and end to access info that wouldnt be available without Snowden messing with the algorithm, such as making a private Instagram profile public for that window of time or like tonight with Twitter and the memes so we can get the incriminating info. Is this correct?
I think that if someone thinks it’s become too tedious, it’s probably a good idea to give it a rest and do something else.
Q is going to do what Q is going to do. No point in following it, if a person finds it disagreeable. Plenty of other things going on in the world.
Which university they started with was mentioned in one of the articles that I read. I don’t remember though.
GO OGLE.
To ogle-stare at in a lecherous manner.
synonyms: leer at, stare at, eye, make eyes at, check out; More informal give someone the once-over, lech after, undress with ones eyes.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Oh that is a really eerie and true observation. Thanks.
THAT is a concept suitable for a meme.
Guy sits in front of monitor - Google is at the heading area. A big eye is popping out of the monitor. The “Google” in the heading area is broken out just like you have described above.
HOW ABOUT IT MEMESTERS and graphic artists among us?
I missed it. Fell asleep and took a long nap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.