Skip to comments.
Q Anon: (4/8/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
qntmpkts.keybase.pub ^
| 4/8/2018
| FReepers, Vanity
Posted on 04/08/2018 6:58:47 PM PDT by ransomnote
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680, 1,681-1,700 ... 2,361-2,368 next last
To: NIKK

**************************************************************
Lisa----I think the message Q is relaying re: who is standing next to @POTUS & @VP is that our military (under Mattis) & No Such Agency (under Rogers) are in full control and have our President's back. Bolton there to clean House. Capitalization of H makes me think Ryan is in trouble.
1,661
posted on
04/10/2018 9:03:19 AM PDT
by
STARLIT
(Trust The Plan.)
To: LuvFreeRepublic
1,662
posted on
04/10/2018 9:03:24 AM PDT
by
Kalam
(<: The answer is 42 :>)
To: NIKK
To: LuvFreeRepublic
That was Lisa Crowley posting..I agree with her.
1,664
posted on
04/10/2018 9:04:03 AM PDT
by
STARLIT
(Trust The Plan.)
To: rodguy911
nicely done. Luke Rosiak of the Daily Caller has been connecting the dots on thww Awans Paki influence for awhile.
interesting articles here.
https://www.dawn.com/news/944935
http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/14/dem-it-aide-used-political-influence-to-have-fraud-charges-dropped-in-pakistan-paper-says/
1,665
posted on
04/10/2018 9:04:23 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: bagster
I remember that exact moment of the debate, I told my wife the way Trump said that - he definitely knew the Clinton dirty details already.
1,666
posted on
04/10/2018 9:04:23 AM PDT
by
PMAS
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
To: LuvFreeRepublic
Saw a video ... forget with whom ... maybe Hannity--guest lawyer was noting that he had thought that a non-signed agreement was not binding. Then he noted that because she accepted the money--the agreement was considered in force & binding.
1,667
posted on
04/10/2018 9:04:57 AM PDT
by
JockoManning
(http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
To: NIKK
Niiiiiiice . . . clean House
To: ransomnote
Below is the Q Approved explanation of what is going on with the A posts. You might add this at the top of your thread starter.
Keep in mind that every crumb is not meant to be solved before the event. Some of the drops are things for anons to dig on and make connections with, others are markers for future reference.
>[future proves past]
Some drops are just simply communication to the anons.
What needs to be understood to appreciate whats going here is the fact the Q is basically creating a circular flow diagram that can be referenced and cross-checked with news releases. Q cant just disclose specifics about a situation or operation without violating security protocol. Instead they drop questions and statements that lead to answers that can be understood once the subject becomes public. This provides the validation necessary for the public to believe The Great Awakening is legit. Disinformation and misdirection with Q is real. In other words Q is pointing over there but really the focus is here and only until you publicly get the news can you go back and understand. (Think SA drops) All of this is accomplished without giving up specific details about the operation. Its quite genius.
Apr 9 2018 19:33:59 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 0cd760 974537
>>974444
1,669
posted on
04/10/2018 9:07:11 AM PDT
by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
To: Steven W.
1,670
posted on
04/10/2018 9:08:37 AM PDT
by
bitt
(We do not need the electric chair - we need electric bleachers!)
To: LuvFreeRepublic
--
Perhaps FR legal minds will know if there is a way for DJT to be a party and not sign the agreement. --
Sure. Power of attorney or agent works.
-- Fishy regardless. --
Quite.
To: PMAS
Greatest debate line ever, but a mistake. He tried to walk it back later by saying he wasn't going after Hillary, but it was too late. Her preemptive counter-attack was in the works. All this Russia/Mueller bogus stuff is designed to eat up time and make any Trump attacks look like retaliation or "obstruction of justice."
I'm not 188% convinced that she wouldn't have pulled this without The Donald telegraphing his intent during the debate with that line and the "I'd appoint a special prosecutor to look into..." line, but it's a possibility.
But we already know this, right?
1,672
posted on
04/10/2018 9:10:04 AM PDT
by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
To: TruthWillWin
I’m 100% sure of Sessions’ good intentions and hard work going on in the background.
1,673
posted on
04/10/2018 9:10:36 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: Kalam
I agree 100%.
There are some very vocal people on FR slamming Sessions almost as though it’s a hobby or even a vocation.
1,674
posted on
04/10/2018 9:11:27 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: bagster
We might be well served to know WHEN that picture was taken.
1,675
posted on
04/10/2018 9:11:32 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: JockoManning
Thanks for that lawyer interpretation. Could also be that DJT was not a party to the agreement because it was between Cohen and Stormy. If true, Cohen, Stormy and her attorney are in BIG trouble, possible extortion.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
To: Cats Pajamas
I guess that makes sense...Our President likes to switch things around often in order to confuse the enemy.
1,677
posted on
04/10/2018 9:12:34 AM PDT
by
STARLIT
(Trust The Plan.)
To: bagster
Oh the witch would have set this in motion regardless. For proof, I remember her statement (paraphrased), “If I loose we’re all going to the gallows.”
1,678
posted on
04/10/2018 9:13:30 AM PDT
by
Kalam
(<: The answer is 42 :>)
To: LuvFreeRepublic
Thanks.
That was very encouraging.
1,679
posted on
04/10/2018 9:13:50 AM PDT
by
Califreak
(Take Me Back To Constantinople)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
We might be well served to know WHEN that picture was taken. Ha. Yes, I was thinking the same thing.
1,680
posted on
04/10/2018 9:13:52 AM PDT
by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680, 1,681-1,700 ... 2,361-2,368 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson