To: BroJoeK
I’m not trying to put forth a tu quoque argument as you are with this nonsense, I am merely pointing out that propaganda has been going on a long time in this conflict, and that the term “slaveocracy” was intended from the beginning to be a form of propaganda in the manner that “anti-choice” is also a deliberate misstatement of the other sides’ position.
619 posted on
04/28/2018 3:29:32 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp:
"Im not trying to put forth a tu quoque argument as you are with this nonsense, I am merely pointing out that propaganda has been going on a long time in this conflict, and that the term 'slaveocracy' was intended from the beginning to be a form of propaganda in the manner that 'anti-choice' is also a deliberate misstatement of the other sides position." But unlike "anti-choice" the term "slaveocracy" is a 100% accurate description of who, what & why ruled the Deep South and some regions in Upper South & Border States, and who was grossly over-represented in Congress due to its 3/5 rule.
Sure, the truth might hurt, but it was still the truth.
674 posted on
05/01/2018 10:10:31 AM PDT by
BroJoeK
((a little historical perspective...))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson