Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
It doesn't take much effort to get it to fit. I'm not the one needing to get into the statistical weeds to disprove it. It fits well on the face of it.


499 posted on 04/24/2018 12:57:19 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "I'm not the one needing to get into the statistical weeds to disprove it. It fits well on the face of it. "

Proving yet again that it's much easier for a propagandist to make outrageous claims than it is to refute them in detail.

But I note the words you've quoted are essentially correct:

Sure, but not necessarily Deep Confederate Southern origin.

Sure, but "goes from" does not equate to "produced in", especially not to "produced in the Deep South".

Referring to raw cotton, a few million dollars of the total.

Your author does seem to recognize the difference between Deep South cotton and all other exports, but does not seem to realize that those other exports were not at all necessarily "Southern".

611 posted on 04/28/2018 2:49:57 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson