FLT-bird's version of the Lost Cause myth is somewhat unique, for example, I've never seen another make such a big deal of the Corwin amendment and lie so bald-facedly about it being "offered" and "rejected".
I'd say anyone who can concoct such a claim is a serious propagandist and could find ready employment with the Democrat National Committee.
Same old Southern song-and-dance.
The funniest thing is when these two klowns knock their heads together and accuse us of “revisionist history”.
In the same breath as they whine about Pro-Americans rewriting history they bleat, “We’ve been lied to about the Civil War for our whole lives.” Which is it?!
DegenerateLamp bristles at the term “slavocracy” - even though it pre-dates the Civil War and fltbird drinks heartily from the lost cause bible. They often cite original sources (which is a good thing) but draw conclusions that fly in the face of Occam’s Razor.
They are some peculiar characters!
BroJoeK LT-bird’s version of the Lost Cause myth is somewhat unique, for example, I’ve never seen another make such a big deal of the Corwin amendment and lie so bald-facedly about it being “offered” and “rejected”.
I’d say anyone who can concoct such a claim is a serious propagandist and could find ready employment with the Democrat National Committee.
BroJoeK’s PC Revisionism is pretty much the standard nationalist dogma. Deny quotes that are inconvenient. Claim scholars whose opinions they do not agree with are not scholars and/or are not credible. Refuse to read Lincoln’s inaugural address and just lie about it repeatedly instead. and above all just repeat the word “slavery slavery slavery” no matter how obviously ridiculous that is while at the same time try to deny people then were motivated by pocketbook issues just like they are today and have been throughout history.