I like those questions as places to start, RitaOK. Not sure I understand JW’s stance. I really think Sessions did good.
Professional disagreement on Sessions, perhaps, between JW and Q.
JW is on the ground doing Herculean work battling government corruption and winning, a lot.
Q is obviously in the air, in Intel, or privy to it, having us do the work, battling government corruption and hoping for a win.
One is blunt and visible. The other cryptic and anonymous. Much to be said for both.
The activist business model requires keeping your name visible and soliciting contributions. That doesn’t mean that what you are doing is helpful to the goal that you purport to be working for.