[C19fan]

This supports theories that migrants from Asia hugged the coasts traveling down the Pacific Coast.

[Vaquero]

Ping

[Stingray51]

Typical Daily Mail in that the article is really weak on explaining the science behind these footprints still being there and how they were dated.

In addition to people coming down the coast from the Bering land bridge, it seems likely to me that they also came to South / Central America directly from the Pacific. People crossed the Pacific and populated the Polynesian islands, which are tiny dots in a vast ocean, so it stands to reason that some missed the islands and hit the America’s.

[pepsionice]

If you go back to 13,000 years ago....seas were around 300 feet less than what they are today. It wouldn’t have been that hard to cross from Asia across Alaska.

[PapaBear3625]

This supports theories that migrants from Asia hugged the coasts traveling down the Pacific Coast.

This makes a lot of sense. Lots of fish and seals on the coast, while you work your way down to warmer areas.

[jerod]

Earliest ever found in North America... Regardless... Pretty old.

[piroque]

Yes but were they going north or south ?

[Gay State Conservative]

All three were barefoot? Couldn't they afford Air Jordans?

Good God...what a stupid comment..."all barefoot".

[i_robot73]

>
This supports theories that migrants from Asia hugged the coasts traveling down the Pacific Coast.
>

Great, but were they African-American footprints? I mean, it is THE ‘starting point’ of human civilization, so I’m told.

[ml/nj]

Such BS. You cannot see my footprints from more than a day ago anywhere. But we're supposed to believe that someone found 13,000 year-old foot prints.

ML/NJ

[dirtymac]

they were made 13,000 years ago or could have been made last week. We still are too sure just yet but the 13,000 year tag will get a lot more attention and drive the narrative.