[greeneyes]

There are references to DAG as a position...
*******************************************************
I think that depends on “style”

When I wrote reports for Internal Control or Procedures, it was standard to refer to the person as their title - not their name ie CEO, COO, Supervisor etc.

Part of this was simply to be neutral and not trigger someone by using their name. If someone goofs and you have to report it, somehow it takes the sting out of it - just a bit.

So that was the style that we were supposed to use. To this day, I use that same style from habit.

[bagster]

So in layman’t terms, you would refer to me as “the obnoxious freeper” to spare my feelings. Appreciate that, GE. Respect.

[Cboldt]

-- When I wrote reports for Internal Control or Procedures, it was standard to refer to the person as their title - not their name ie CEO, COO, Supervisor etc. --

Sessions refers to Wray by name. Rather than try to state my impression, which might influence yours, read Sessions' letter of march 29, looking for references to people and positions.

I was paying attention to signs of cooperation (or not) or division of oversight between Sessions/Huber and Rosenstein/Mueller sort of thing.