Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
"that the Great Army was not actually so great after all, numbering at most in the hundreds..."

Though an army of hundreds in the early middle ages was still a large undertaking.

For the Romans that was just a joke, but for the Anglo-Saxons, that was an Army

9 posted on 03/27/2018 12:32:35 AM PDT by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
The Great Army was much much larger, as the rest of the article and new research indicates. Good point about the Romans, though, after Augustus' reforms the entire Roman army was 280,000 strong (half auxiliaries) on paper, lower numbers in reality, to cover the whole Empire's frontiers and, at its peak, 50,000,000 residents.

14 posted on 03/27/2018 1:35:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson