Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Unfortunately, a lot of folks believes movies are historic accounts . Especially when they try to portray it has such. I remember in that movie the narrator referring often of particular items being a "historic fact". And today, so many young folks especially believe any movie item relating to a past person, time, or place is factual history.
249 posted on 03/25/2018 6:29:29 PM PDT by TianaHighrider (Deplorable me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: TianaHighrider

The recent— ALAMO!?!
With Billy Bob Thornton was As
Accurate as could be.

A Western?

Dang close to it .


257 posted on 03/25/2018 6:45:02 PM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

To: TianaHighrider

What you said is a major issue. There are a lot of people who learn history from movies.

I remember being so shocked that I involuntarily burst out laughing after seeing “Apollo 13”. The lights came on, we were walking out, and there was a teenage couple in front of us and I heard the girl say: “I was really glad the movie ended the way it did!”

Now “Apollo 13” isn’t a bad movie from a factual perspective, it just blew me away that she somehow didn’t seem to know it was a real event!

Even worse was just a few days ago...I was wearing my ship’s hat from my Navy days, and a young kid (maybe 16) who was an employee at the hardware store came over and asked about the hat. He was a real nice, well behaved kid...he looked clean cut, short hair, no tats or piercings, and was very polite.

In the course of the discussion, he asked me when Pearl Harbor was. He was a very nice and earnest kid, but that really shook me!


304 posted on 03/25/2018 8:20:28 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

To: TianaHighrider

***often of particular items being a “historic fact”.***

That would be the voice over of Custer hoping to be nominated for President of the United States that year. Problem is, Rutherford B Hayes had been nominated a week before.
This nonsense came from a book in the 1960s on Custer by Mari Sandoz. I read that book.

I’ve met people who thought Little Big Man was historically correct. What fun telling them the truth. Yes, I have read a huge amount on the Indian Wars at that time.


370 posted on 03/26/2018 7:11:26 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson