Shame, this used to be a place people came for civilized discussion among like minded individuals, maybe not agreeing on every topic, but talking about them.
If you read through my posts my open request to anyone is to provide examples of things that Q anon has predicted that can be verified.
I will readily admit that I am not an "anon" a "weaponized autist" or a "chan". I am also not a troll. I have been on Free Republic for 20 years, bukko. Quite a few years longer than you, even. Let's keep it civil, one old timer to another.
You say that part of the Q-anon 'autists' role is "to calm and interpret events for the normies when the storm hit in full."
I think providing a short list of Q predicted events that either have come true, or you believe will come true, would be one very simple way to do that. In fact, I am doing it and would appreciate your or anyone else's help.
But, I will carry on without assistance if no one is interested in helping, that's fine. It's just a lot of people have more expertise in the interpretation of Q here.
To point out how "normies" see it, "meatspace" is pretty key. "Q posts to match to meatspace events.." are pretty much required for Q to be real.
If nothing Q posts about matches "meatspace events" for months and months, then it becomes pretty obvious you are dealing with fantasy of some sort.
I have a friend who seriously believes in the alien lizard elite theory. Conspiracy craze: why 12 million Americans believe alien lizards rule us
I am really hoping that Qanon isn't a mega-magnitude group delusion like the alien lizard theory, but it's going to take "meat space events" and "normies" to prove that.
No matter what "Q says".
BTW: The atmosphere being created on this thread is quite hostile to skeptics, good people who are trying to figure things out. I have a 1/2 dozen PM's in my inbox from people who said "thanks for trying to keep us honest, sorry you are being called names by people". In other words, they don't want to deal with the true believers because they don't want to be called an "azzhole" "troll" "troll boi" and other insulting name by you and the other thread autists.
You haven’t been “skeptical” you’ve been rude and condescending
As I pointed out here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3642244/posts?page=952#952
Troll.
“If you read through my posts my open request to anyone is to provide examples of things that Q anon has predicted that can be verified.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No one has to provide you examples of anything. Kind souls here have directed you to information to pursue, but it seems you just want us to provide you proof. There is no absolute proof.
..Sorry, friend, but it seems that you just want to argue - and we’re too interested in other items to read, rather than to bother to argue with you.
Those attempts to challenge or argue DISRUPT US from what we’re pursuing. Disrupting is annoying.
Yep. Pretty much goes without saying. Any reader walking in will see it. As for your contributions as a contrarian, tough to manage. I was a pariah here (at FR, not yet on Q) on the subject of Scooter Libby, and just quit posting for a couple years. I'd quit again and have no heartburn over it.
Close to nobody's mind is changed here, and just due to the sheer number of people posting, it's likely to open a BS argument between people. There is close to a hundred current Freepers that I simply write off as cranks, and (to the extent I can keep track of it and maintain discipline) just don't engage. My contribution to keeping the peace. I am totally indifferent to the bulk of FR going off in wrongheaded directions. I used to try to "fix it," and found out in short order that it is a fool's errand. People do not read.
At any rate, use your own judgment, do what suits you. You don't owe anybody here your thoughts or corrections of errors and mistakes. FR will self-police itself to "whatever," no fault of yours or mine or any individual. Unreasonable friction comes with the territory or relatively open online forums.
I think your "disagreements" on the Q threads have been asserted in good faith, well-taken, clearly expressed, etc. IOW, I don't see "troll" or an effort to disrupt. Your posts aren't repetitive or demeaning.
Making this remark in public because I think the forum deserves and benefits most from public exchange. I do recognize that this post is a distraction from the subject, and for that I apologize to the readers.
Hello Jack Black. I hope you do not mind my intrusion. I think I understand where you are coming from. I used to feel the same way. I didn’t post my thoughts of disagreement, but I was highly skeptical of the whole Q fad because I didn’t understand it.
But, to be fair, the more I saw the more I wanted to check it out for myself. I read a lot on the 8chan board and then found the link to all of the Q posts. 8chan gets a little crazy and it can be hard to keep up with the discussions over there.
If you really want to understand why people are gravitating towards the information provided by Q maybe the link below will help. Not saying this will change your mind, but it might help you understand where people who post on these threads are coming from.
I have changed my view on Q. I do believe the person/people posting as Q are closely associated with POTUS. I think their goal is to inform people who can go out and inform more people. Trump is counting on the People to rally and support the obliteration of the Deep State and the draining of the Swamp.
It took decades to create this mess. It’s not going to be fixed quickly.
The link below contains a lot of information about Q and his links to POTUS. Q is not a modern day Nostradomus. Much of what was provided was to prove the connections to POTUS. If what he/they allude to is factual, then many people will be in for a shock. So shocking many will not want to believe. Q is asking people to help prepare as many as possible. Trump will benefit from the support of the people once major actions are taken and the MSM onslaught intensifies. That is Q’s actual purpose.
Reviewing the information at this link will take some time. If you are able to spend the time with it and have questions I am sure there are people here who would have no problem engaging in civil dicussions about it.
Again, I apologize in advance if my post here seems instusive
https://theyig.ning.com/q/remember-the-flags-q-posted-back-to-them?xg_source=twitter
And you replied:
If you read through my posts my open request to anyone is to provide examples of things that Q anon has predicted that can be verified.
(Yeah, I saw your rationale in the next sentence, to wit:
You say that part of the Q-anon 'autists' role is "to calm and interpret events for the normies when the storm hit in full."
I think providing a short list of Q predicted events that either have come true, or you believe will come true, would be one very simple way to do that.)
That's the rub. The storm hasn't hit yet.
Let me see if I can spell it out slowly here.
There are over 18,000 sealed indictments, vastly greater than the norm. I know of two or three which have been unsealed: that weirdo sex-ring-branding women thing today, one corrupt MA state legislator, one corrupt FL state official. Both the state officials were nailed for things *like* bribery, money laundering, racketeering, yada yada.
Keeping in mind Attorney General Session's emphasis on pedophilia and President Donald John Trump's Executive Order of Dec. 21 governing human trafficking *and* pilfering of national resources, let us make a 0th order approximation, that 2/3 of the 18,000 indictments, will be for crooked pols concerning bribery, racketeering, and the other 6,000 sex/trafficking stuff.
Even leaving aside Q, first recall that the Bamster *decimated* (or in the literal sense of that word, even more than decimated) the Dem Party: he destroyed their farm-team of up-and-comers, so that the top contenders for the Dem nomination right now include Commie "I never held a job until I was 40" Sanders, Grey Beaver, and Creepy Joe Biden.
Against Donald Trump? Are they f-ing KIDDING?
So, what happens, when those indictments hit -- and take out a LOT of the farm team of both the Dems and GOP, and a LOT of the do-gooder officials of corrupt charities? What happens when the executives of some of the best known companies IN THE WORLD (Twitter, Facebook, Google) bite the dust?
(Hint 1: Faecesbook is facing a possible $2 TRILLION in fines at $40,000/head for violating a previous court agreement from 2012 about privacy.)
(Hint 2: Q posted that nobody who played games gets off scot-free. NOBODY. Don't you realize that nobody on earth expected any kind of pushback on Faecesbook, and yet they've lost, what $7 BILLION in market cap in a single week, and the sheet hasn't even hit the propellor yet?)
So normies -- whose diet has been until a couple of weeks ago, "Russia Russia Russia" and then suddenly changed to Stormy ("the press strains out a Trump but swallows a Lewinsky") the Stripper, and Camera Hogg fake victim --
What are they going to do when the Storm hits? They've been carefully shielded or distracted from ALL of it.
Whanging about with "Gotcha" brain farts about Hillary aren't going to matter at that point.
If you’re unhappy with the atmosphere, or comments, on these Q threads, you are free to take a self-imposed break.
Sometimes that’s the best way to handle frustration...just step away from whatever is causing said frustration.
No need to reply back....just offering a kindly PSA.