Q Anon: (3/22/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/22/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[bitt]

MAYBE, just maybe, McTurtle and Ryan gave this the rush job to

a. get the military money quickly for DJT and
b. use excuse of omnibus to be able to either not use or use funds not directed.
c. sneak all those poison pills in there that the rats didn’t know about (no abortion in jails, no pushing gun control, etc)

[Hostage]

Yep.

The good news is the Trump Admin can slow-walk these funds to PP while simultaneously prosecuting them for trafficking in baby parts.

[Bob Ireland]

***redstate.com***

Nice! ...needed historical lesson.

[bitt]

I’m caught up!! Yay!!

[bagster]

none of the funds made available under this Act may be used to pay for the performance of abortion as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions.

Well, well, welly well. How did THAT get in there.

I wonder if botox face knows about THAT.

Ahahahahahaha. I think somebody snuck into the copy room when this mess was being printed up. Very poor security, if you ask me.

[Axenolith]

Trump could really put the shaft to the legislative piles of crap by using the 1.6 billion to build a very long section of wall constructed of reinforcing steel set within forms! Ready to go for future concrete pouring :-)

[Snowybear]

Yeah okay, the guy had me up to the Reptilian crap. Seriously?

[Nailbiter]

post 1773 indicates she did not vote for it

[Duchess47]

So far and I’ve just been cherry picking, this bill looks like it was written by 100 different people who never talked to each other.

A lot of it doesn’t make sense to me, then suddenly there will be a burst of clear, understandable language.

They got really petty about the border. Funds for 7500 vehicles but 6500 of them have to be replacements. Stuff like that. That makes no sense. Money for 7500 vehicles, why can only 1000 of them be in excess of what they currently have? If I understand what they are saying.

[grey_whiskers]

I like the way you think. :-)

[bagster]

Yeah okay, the guy had me up to the Reptilian crap. Seriously?

What, you don't believe? Perhaps this bit of recently discovered video will help convince you.

Doubt At Your Own Risk.

C'mon man. Get with the program.

[Lady Heron]

I wondered if it was true or not. LOL....so much for a little hope.

[JockoManning]

Mostly military appointees.

[defconw]

Place Mark

[grey_whiskers]

Wut?

[Bob Ireland]

But not caught up with! ;^)

[bagster]

Yea, it looks like, just from my reading of posts here, that there are a lot of contradictory clauses. For example, none of the funds made available under this Act may be used to pay for the performance of abortion would seem to negate some of the other abortion language.

There is also a lot of "may" spend as opposed to "should" spend language. That leaves the executive a lot of discretion. Keep in mind that "should" does not equal "shall." Lawyers will have a field day ripping this thing up.

I think the kids in the candy store may have had too many cooks and they spoiled the broth. <---Three metaphors in one sentence. :)

[No_Doll_i]

bags, I think everyone is either reading stuff or has gone to bed.

[bagster]

I think so too. Boooooring.

I guess I need to go find some light entertainment elsewhere. :(. I'll check in periodically till I sleep the sleep of the damned.

[buffaloguy]

“I think the kids in the candy store may have had too many cooks and they spoiled the broth. <-—Three metaphors in one sentence. :)”

Boy howdy, that went quickly.