Posted on 03/22/2018 6:22:46 PM PDT by ransomnote
Damn, that’s one helluva reading assignment.
Abel Danger (AD) claims Hillary Clinton arranged a 1994 set-aside contract for an 8(a) woman-owned company Base One Technologies to install Sun servers in the Pentagon and help DOJ Pride insiders to entrap U.S. military leaders in a honey-pot pedophile ring.
Clinton-Marcy Pedophilia Unleashes DOGS OF WAR 4 July, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zGlSYxQ4TU
Here’s some positive news for you.
WILL NORTH KOREA GIVE UP NUCLEAR WEAPONS? THESE PHOTOS SUGGEST KIM JONG UN MAY BE SERIOUS
BY TOM O’CONNOR
North Korea has suspended activity at its main nuclear site, according to recent satellite imagery and expert analysis that appeared to support Pyongyang’s offers to solve the crisis on the Korean Peninsula diplomatically.
That’s a very good different direction. If they’re able to ship artwork I’d have to jump in and say...what else are they shipping. They’re bold now.
And, I believe a Red or Green Queen, or both.
Have we had a Red or Green King?
Any Pawns of Green or Red?
Knights (horses)?
Bishops? Hmmmmm....remember those nazi pics with Priests?
I think the Army Corps / Greencastle, Indiana connection is wrong. Too narrow, and I am not buying the theory that somehow Trump is going to “trick” his way into using the Army Corps to build a concrete wall. He’s done an outstanding job of following protocol, and until Congress appropriates funds for a concrete wall, he isn’t going to do more than planning and token efforts at groundbreaking.
I don’t know what the correct “castle interpretation” is, I just don’t see it being related to Army Corps or “build the wall.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
You make some great points.
I think the anons certainly have good reason for proposing their theory, - and it may be correct.... but it is also true, and I think we should always keep it in mind, that MULTIPLE CONCEPTS is a valid approach!
I don’t have any idea either! But why not avoid locking down our thinking, as you suggest?
rabbies holes are the reason i never make to the end of a Q thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9lEtLZm3bE
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11mVLF8DESmVOBvaWYBj4yj3wUySn3S0D/view
rabbies holes are the reason i never make to the end of a Q thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9lEtLZm3bE
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11mVLF8DESmVOBvaWYBj4yj3wUySn3S0D/view
I haven’t taken the time nor have I run across any prototype renderings of the wall.
Wasn’t there a bollard-type concept offered? I kinda like that concept, and we could see through it which I think is quite important.
I don’t see any mention of Wayne.
I agree with both of you...
On December 21 DJT signed the order declaring a national emergency ! We are/ were under attack. In that document is mentioned drug and human trafficking. The protection of our nation is his responsibility.
He is commander in chief he can order the troops anywhere he wants and he will!
THe money for the military is already appropriated. The Army corp of engineers have been working on the border since July.
Levee are made of dirt. Dirt is free. The Rio Grand already has dams and needs flood control. That’s where it will start.
Was looking to see if the three directors of the FTC cleared. The Internet Bill of Rights will be their responsibility
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Excellent point!
YIKES!
(re: Marcy..... wonder if there is a family tie in to Ft Marcy Park....)
That one pointed to Sec. 230 and page number on the enrolled bill.
230(b) contains the construction style restriction.
641
1 SEC. 230. (a) Of the amount made available in this
2 Act under ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection--Procure-
3 ment, Construction, and Improvements'', $1,571,000,000
4 shall be available only as follows:
5 (1) $251,000,000 for approximately 14 miles of
6 secondary fencing, all of which provides for cross-bar-
7 rier visual situational awareness, along the southwest
8 border in the San Diego Sector;
9 (2) $445,000,000 for 25 miles of primary pedes-
10 trian levee fencing along the southwest border in the
11 Rio Grande Valley Sector;
12 (3) $196,000,000 for primary pedestrian fencing
13 along the southwest border in the Rio Grande Valley
14 Sector;
15 (4) $445,000,000 for replacement of existing pri-
16 mary pedestrian fencing along the southwest border;
17 (5) $38,000,000 for border barrier planning and
18 design; and
19 (6) $196,000,000 for acquisition and deployment
20 of border security technology.
21 (b) The amounts designated in subsection (a)(2)
22 through (a)(4) shall only be available for operationally ef-
23 fective designs deployed as of the date of the Consolidated
24 Appropriations Act, 2017, (Public Law 115-31), such as
642
1 currently deployed steel bollard designs, that prioritize
2 agent safety.
3 (c) None of the funds provided in this or any other
4 Act shall be obligated for construction of a border barrier
5 in the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge.
ThanQ!! However, the link’s not working for me. (May be on my end: tight security configuration...)
Bollard type construction?
I been playing around with a bollard fence concept, but instead of using steel posts, I would go with ductile iron pipe which is typically used for water main service. Hefty wall thickness, great resistance to corrosion and a byotch to cut with a torch.
ThanQ!! However, the link’s not working for me. (May be on my end: tight security configuration...)
If anyone is interested and doesn’t have enough to read, here is “The Book of Q” and no I have not read it all.
http://irc.qclearancearchive.net/02.%20QMaps/Q’s%20posts%20-%20CBTS%20-%207.5.0.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.