Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: saywhatagain
-- It the explains the definition of sealed indictment. --

Even that increases the risk of a leak. If DOJ is working on 100 cases, as one of yesterday's Q-drops suggests, there is no advantage to "sharing" them with a court, until close to the time an arrest is intended to be effected.

The reason to have paperwork in the court is to protect the fairly tight timelines that due process provides between arrest and being confronted with charges.

Another thought occurred to me. Assuming the charges are in the nature of material support for terrorists, a general approach in open court would be to hide the ID of the terrorist, in order to protect an ongoing investigation or military operation. That precaution would not be required if the terrorist is dealt with first. Maybe a substantial part of the delay is dealing with the outside actors, so they can be revealed when the inside actors are arrested and charged.

1,300 posted on 03/18/2018 4:51:19 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies ]


To: Bigg Red

Mark


1,302 posted on 03/18/2018 4:55:17 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Francis is a Nincompope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson