Good for them if they live in a place where they can get away with it!
_____________________
so you don’t believe that men and women should support their lawful children? I am not sure we have much more to discuss.
____________
Of course I would argue there’s probably much more to the story than you reveal if those men are willing to cut off their nose to spite their face in such a way, but it does reveal what you consider the salient issue. “Child support” sounds rather innocuous when one is actually talking about “chilamony,” custody dispute, etc.
__________________________________
I don’t know what you mean by chilamony. child support is needed when custody arrangements are lopsided. No custody disputes in any of the situations cited, none of the men wanted more than brief weekly visitation. They just didn’t want to support their legal children. I was appalled. These are successful men who copped out on their kids. The children of all these families are now between the ages of 18 and 38. They carry those scars of not being valued by their fathers.
______________
Furthermore, some custodial mothers pimp out their children as sexual slaves. Others allow their children to be molested by their live-in boyfriends. Does that change your opinion of female rectitude?
_______________
Jesus Christ protect me! So you are equating felonious immoral criminal behavior as a baseline to judge mothers/parents?
You are a sick ...one.
Oh I guarantee you won't want to continue the discussion, but it will be with the standard female faux outrage used in place of reasoned argumentation.
I don’t know what you mean by chilamony.
And apparently you lack the intellectual curiosity to find out by investing two mouse clicks while already seated at your computer.
They just didn’t want to support their legal children. I was appalled. These are successful men who copped out on their kids.
Apparently you'll believe any fairytale so long as it confirms your bias. Successful men DO NOT walk away from careers they've spent YEARS developing for trivial reasons.
Either there are elements to these stories you don't know, or you're simply not disclosing them. Men do not deploy that kind of self-injuring spite just to evade responsibilities they've previously accepted and maintained.
So you are equating felonious immoral criminal behavior as a baseline to judge mothers/parents?
Not at all.
I'm simply demonstrating histrionic anecdotes that prove nothing are easy to counter.
You can't have it both ways. If you can judge men as parents based on hearsay about their willingness to pay their ex-wives, I can judge women as parents by equally self-serving standards.