jer, you should know that txhurl, SkyPilot, and zzeeman have persuaded me that my initial reading was in error.
Apparently the true context is that Snowden was given 24 hours (and just as huge as receivership) has responded. (Unless my understanding of this one is also scrambled!)
The proper understanding, zzeeman explains, is the context of the discussion on the 8ch thread.
Q post #904 today...
DhytcDFbF5874/37875
Q
# 709 from feb. 10th
JFK Con Room.
https://www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code/code-1.html
Would you believe this site is actually used to comm to rogue operators?
@Snowden
[John]
Cold?
Q
Q gave us the link to the CIA kids code page, https://www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code/code-1.html
has anybody tried running different Q posts like today’s “DhytcDFbF5874/37875” or Trump tweets etc. through the code deciphers?
What I should do is read until the drop has been thoroughly discussed by my betters, and then I won’t need to clog up the thread with questions that have already been hashed out and figured out!
...shame...