Replies

Cabal response: OK. Here’s a suicide for ya and just for s#!+s & giggles, we’ll make sure it’s staged in a manner to imply the ultimate threat of assassination. (Note: Trumps are at Mar-A-Lago today)

Unless you have plenty of assets you don't waste them. As far as a threat of assassination...a much closer incident would have sent more of a signal.
Knocking on the door of an empty house is pretty lame.
That's the sign of a thief, not a murderer.

1- I’m not convinced Q was predicting a *high profile* suicide...
Granted, but time will tell. However, the location alone already makes it high profile.

2 - ...or if Q was implying a ratcheting up of tension that would make people contemplate suicide...
I would amend that...ratcheting up of tension of possible criminal prosecution against them that would make people contemplate suicide. There is usually a reason when people kill themselves.

3 - ...or if Q knew that public suicides by unstable/manipulated individuals in evocative venues was in the cabal playbook.
Again, a waste of valuable resources, IMO. How many fails does it take to get one that is capable of being manipulated? (rhetorical)

Cabal response: OK. Here’s a suicide for ya and just for s#!+s & giggles, we’ll make sure it’s staged in a manner to imply the ultimate threat of assassination. (Note: Trumps are at Mar-A-Lago today)

I would amend that...ratcheting up of tension of possible criminal prosecution against them that would make people contemplate suicide. There is usually a reason when people kill themselves.

I vote for that. Evading prosecution and the fear of not just punishemet, but everything they've done getting exposed.

I went back and read the research board for that day. Q was taunting someone possibly a Rothschild. Whoever it was, he said we tried to warn you, and the following post was when he posted the message that ended with suicide weekend?

One of the Anons noted that a Rothschild deleted a twitter message - I think that was the one that was a laughing twitter.