I work with many people on these drugs. I could get some of them to admit to assassinating Kennedy and stick to that story if I wanted to but these same people are often barely capable of actions as complicated as making toast. Is this the kind of person capable of planning and executing some of these attacks? Would you trust someone like this to do something complicated for you?
Now, I do understand that eye witnesses are not a terribly reliable source. Still, its the details that tend to be filled in/gotten wrong, not the major events/players.
Why do these stories always have multiple perps that somehow get reduced to one in the final version? How are lone individuals capable of doing some of the things theyve done in the fraction of time it supposedly occurs?
Why in some of these stories is one person seemingly in more than one place or in another story the perp is supposedly dressed totally different, say one witness claims an armored ninja and the next saw a kid in a red tshirt/jeans?
To pull off some of these things you would need more than one person but then if someone is caught it could lead back to those who planned it. You need a patsy. You need someone to be the suspect that throws investigators and the public off the trail. Someone who will never be believed if they ever do change their story.
For that you need to turn someone "suspectable".
I like your analysis.
suspectable=patsy?