Ok, I missed the older post re: Jason Bourne,
I don’t think that changes anything regarding the fictional movie plot and the possible real life plot I laid out about how I believe the CIA through it’s investment company in-q-tel
http://www.businessinsider.com/companies-funded-by-cia-2016-9
has “partnered” with social media companies not only to survail people on a huge scale using things “recorded future”
https://www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/
to learn not only what people do online, but where they go, who they talk to, what they say, how they are connected to everyone from friends to family and co-workers.
I believe the CIA realized they no longer have to “put a chip” in people when they could instead have them purchase a device to bug thier homes (Alexa, Google home etc) or buy a handheld device like (iPhone Google pixel Samsung) that they take with them everywhere. With the added bonus of generating thier own income to get around that pesky Congress approving and looking into thier spending.
Combine that with the “iron hand” Assassination plot line. The mk ultra info, And the Q references to “voices in head” and it makes for some pretty scary possibilities. It reminded me of a different movie.
Did you have any other quibbles? I would like to hear them, It may make me see something I missed or remind me of something I already knew.
As I said, you and I are pretty much on the same page.
I do quibble on including Apple in your list. The Deep State, both FBI and the CIA has expended an inordinate amount of time, PR, and effort to force Apple into opening the Apple hardware and iOS to them through the San Bernardino case and several other cases around the country. Q even made it plain when he posted “Apple vs [Samsung]” with Samsung in the kill box along with the Google Pixel above it also in a kill box, but not Apple.
Q has never singled out Apple for attention in any drop as he has the others. Historically, I find it interesting that in several cases where Apple with demonstrably superior 256 bit built-in AES end-to-end security with US designed Apple iPhones (UK military and MI6 chose iPhones as did Mossad), but our CIA and government opted to go with foreign designed Samsung and Android phones despite requiring bolted on third-party encryption with encryption passwords stored in an open easily accessible clear text file. . . And forced our military to go that direction as well for standardization purposes.
At the time, there were already readily available cracking tools for the Samsung phone unlocking and NONE at all for the iPhone which even local police departments could afford. Even later, after the San Bernardino Terrorists iPhone was eventually broken into, it was an OLDER iPhone and iOS. Today, there remains no generally available tools for breaking into a modern iPhone and iOS without actually destroying the iPhone in the process and likely also destroying in the data the authorities are seeking. And Apple is still refusing to allow the FBI or any government agency to get access to the hardware or codes.
Even in the Snowden NSA releases, all of the Apple hacking and break in tools were for OLDER versions of iOS and macOS, not the modern stuff. . . And they required physical access to the mobile device to be used to install either a hardware chip or jailbreak iOS and then install software which would NOT survive the next update from Apple.