Posted on 02/23/2018 12:05:00 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
I'm having trouble with the websites I normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
Note that Free Republic does not host links to 8 Chan so if you choose to share such links, please do so using "Private Reply" or FReepmail. Thank you.
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633864/posts?page=15#15
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
No doubt there is great evil done, including with children—and at least some more of that is going to come out.
But spreading unconfirmed extreme stories about Hillary IMO hurts rather than helps the cause. And I think that is why some stories like that are dangled out there.
Poppy Bush gave us shivers when he was "under" Reagan. Qx felt he was Reagan's minder/boss from the globalists.
Not really hidden for those who would bother to look:
I disagree.
I believe that the credibility of such sources and stories take a huge leap many levels UP as such things are proven to be mild compared to the actual realities.
At that point, folks being red pilled becomes greatly more successful at deeper and more intense levels.
The tsk tsk wails of "false conspiracy theory" wailing folks are usually fairly terminally uninformed to begin with. Their allegiances are fickle at best--in many cases. They seem to think largely with their emotions vs their intellect. They seem to be puppets of the MSM. etc. etc. etc.
For one, in case after case after case, the folks alerting to conspiracies being real have been proven right over and over and over again.
That track record is now many decades long. The poorly informed may still be ignorant of it but not the wise and well informed.
And, often, even the wildest assertions often have a kernel of truth in them--that eventually surfaces.
Therefore, I consider their tsk tsk tsking to be shallow, temporary and of little weight with most well-informed, thoughtful, bright people.
In terms of credibility--organizations like FR; individuals like Hannity; Lou Dobbs etc. built up their credibility over a long period of time.
Thoughtful, mature, bright folks realize that even a horrendous hit of negative credibility is just that--a rare exception to the rule. They won't give it much undue weight--compared to the longer history of great credibility.
There was a long list of very high powered FREEPERS who--with great hostility and sway with JR--insisted that Qx deliberately talked about UFO's and globalism totally to cause disrepute to FR.
They could not have been further from the truth. Nevertheless, they had quite a following on FR with some support for that perspective from JR.
How does that perspective look now?
The DOD has published an official UFO video from a military jet's camera with affirming authentication that it is the real thing. And, evidently virtually all FREEPERS have NOW realized that the globalist threat to our Republic is extremely real and outrageously threatening.
If anything, FR's denial of the evidence and facts earlier did more to damage FR's credibility to well informed researchers than any significant negative effects from the worst of Qx's rants about UFO's and globalism/globalists.
We can agree to disagree—but there is a reason that the opposition plants fake extreme versions of bad stories that are otherwise likely to come out.
Therefore, it is mercy to them and to the culture to help prepare as many as possible that extremely deep cesspools of outrageous evil are going to be disclosed.
People desperately need to quit playing Tiddly winks and singing Kum-Bye-Yah and brace themselves if they want to avoid becoming catatonic, immobilized, dysfunctional, side-lined.
So, theoretically, in some respects, even inaccurate wildly negative stuff could serve a useful purpose of jolting folks toward being awake and better prepared to receive usefully the coming horrible proofs of devastating facts.
Otherwise, the degree of catatonia and/or chaos in the streets will likely be a much greater risk without such preparatory narratives and allegations.
Just consider the liberals you know. What percentage of them have been taking Kool-Aid IV for decades? i.e. how many of them are such dyed-in-the-wool liberal idiots that they cannot even conceive of the more shallow, milder levels of such satanic horrors and government complicity--particularly by their worshiped leaders.
Without any preliminary clues ahead of time--such people are highly likely to be utterly overwhelmed by shock and stay in a condition of shock for extended hours, if not days.
Keep in mind that a lot of such folks are hyper-rationalists and disbelieve totally in any kind of good/evil paradigm--particularly any supernatural paradigm involving a real satan.
What will happen to them when satan's minions doing super hideously horrific satanic things are shoved in their faces? ... all the more so 'out of the blue' suddenly full-force shock?
I don’t understand the part the wild socks plays in your narrative about Bush Sr. Are they some sort of known symbol?
True. I just think their influence is greater with thoughtless, shallow and poorly informed folks.
I take them as a glimpse of “flamboyance” from a man who lived in a button-down, closeted (pun intended) age.
I likewise have always been suspicious of men dressing as women—for whatever occasion.
But the thing is that the leftist half of our country will be told that these are lies and made up evidence—and that is exactly why having a vivid example of such a lie is all the more valuable to them in keeping that half of the country in the dark.
You somehow believe that the committed left will believe what is revealed?
And, as such, could be considered to be a tiny hint of his acting out sexual hideousness.
(And of course still it is those in the middle whose opinion both sides are also always vying for.)
Plenty true.
Meanwhile, buckle up, we’ve got the Drudge siren:
“TRUMP SETS SHOCK ANNOUNCEMENT”
I sometimes think that Corsi either still gets input from POTUS as a friend or knows him well enough to anticipate him fairly well.
Zach on Infowars now. Says big false flag event in Syria with chemical weapons that they are trying to pin on Assad. Says the same people, with the same money behind it, that are killing kids in Broward are killing kids now in Syria.
Wow—now Zach talking about how he was up close working with CAIR and that they were very deeply embedded in the Obama admin, related to the Arwan (sp?) brothers, close to the Clintons, and funded by and directed from Saudi Arabia. The sheriff in Broward of course hired one of their guys, which is how it came up.
Zach saying this is war, they’ll keep trying to assassinate Trump and if they can’t do it literally, they’ll try to do it politically. Again talking about the military tribunals that will handle people in Gitmo. Says the bad actors know their bosses and funders are headed there and they are cooked as well, so doing anything, killing practically anybody, to try to fight it.
No huge surprise, right?
No, but it’s hard to get your hopes up — and then have to wait for upwards of 10 months to see the real action on it.
Thank you...I refuse to read Q, only once, and it does not make sense to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.