We have what is and we have what ought to be.
What is = ontology. For example: Life exists on earth.
What ought to be = moral law. For example: People should treat each other with kindness.
Then we have phenomenology, which is the subjective experience. This is what you emphasize.
If I emphasize it, it’s because the entire ‘world’ is the result of innumerable subjective experiences.
We may be possessed of that ‘Little Spark of Celestial Fire’; but moral systems themselves result largely from a consensus among subjective ‘experiencers’.
We find it good to be kind because we have experienced unkindness, and unkindness sucks.