Posted on 02/12/2018 3:56:31 AM PST by ransomnote
Edited on 02/13/2018 7:01:59 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to share information and opinions about Q Anon content. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?q=1&;page=1>
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my prior Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference:
A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
Please private message me to report trolls. The Admins have limited time to deal with requests regarding trolls and I'm hoping to reduce abuse reports from this thread from multiple persons into one set of requests.
If you are new to Q Anon trolls, you may find the following thread useful.
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
There is not a question in my mind that legalizing pedophilia IS the next plan. NABLA has been after that for years. I have no problem with people being gay, though I was against gay marriage as being a slap in the face to people who considered it against their religious beliefs. I would prefer civil unions. But the distinction between adults who make conscious decisions in their lives and those who involve CHILDREN! I can hardly even think about it. It horrifies me. But it will be the next “discovered” civil right. And we need to stand firm against letting children choose their sex before we all slip down that horrific slippery slope.
I am guessing bagster doesn't put much store by such things, nor ransomnote, either, but I will let them speak for themselves
For sure. Great points.
It IS THE cookbook isn’t it?
Also, remember Soylent Green is People!
And like I said, if it is a “technology” than the person demonstrating it is now in the black hole he just created along with the entirety of the planet earth.
Well then have them send you Einstein’s field equations and an explanation of the term they believe to be incorrect.
Right.
Personally, I think that the whole black hole aspect of such narratives may not be quite accurate but that there’s not a better meme to use so they use that one.
That’s above my pay grade and evidently above your’s, too.
Actually, there have been rumors for some time that we do have a TRICORDER that can assess medical conditions much as that unit in Star Trek.
___________________
I am certain I’ve seen articles on the diagnostic version of the Tricorder. There are apps for iPhone that dx diabetes, for example. I think more and more parameters are being included, meaning more and more conditions can be assessed digitally w/o invasive tests.
I think it is basically coding standard differential diagnosis for accessible stats: blood sats, blood sugar, standard vitals & whatever else can be determined w/external sensors.
It’s the treatment modality that is still elusive. I think some devices using various colored lasers are an attempt in that direction.Here’s an article from MassGeneral on nanosuturing with lasers
http://www.massgeneral.org/News/newsarticle.aspx?id=1870
Now, I’m seeing more and more reports of quantum entanglement experiments (I do not pretend to understand this stuff)that hint at eventual object transport, but are now limited to particles. Other reports seems to indicate some form of time travel may be possible, also at the moment limited to particles. Ditto thought transference.
The further we progress, the faster the progressions seem to come. Once humans know something is possible, they make it happen. Then they make it portable. Then they make it happen faster. Etc.
One upon a time slow computers took up city blocks and ate enough power to supply a city. Now, very fast computers fit in our hands, are recharged off regular electric sources and cost $1k or less.
What was science fiction twenty years ago is reality, today. It becomes more and more difficult to state what is or isn’t possible. Physics is zooming off into realms everyone thought were nutty. Maybe it is nutty. Maybe not.
Maybe the EM Drive is a step in that direction?
I much agree.
That is certainly NOT an old Ford Model T technology.
Oh it's entirely accurate and quite within my professional expertise. But that is not the point. I am not trying to persuade anyone of anything except that the post that started this off is a bunch of codswallop.
Not exactly. EM drive is very conventional technology, the basic electromagnetic principles behind which have been known since Michael Faraday.
The problem is that while it works for low energy densities - low propulsion forces - as you increase the magnetic fields and the fluid flow velocities you get magneto-hydrodynamic instabilities which disrupt the flow and destroy the efficiency. These instabilities are the same things that cause solar storms for instance and are rather universally observed. If one were clever enough to get it under control, one could create a fusion power plant - but all efforts to date have failed because they have not been able to control these instabilities.
I will note that there have been, over the years, narratives of physicists with 20-30 years teaching experiences at Ivy League Universities who were then let in on the parts of physics realities not widely disclosed--and they were so stunned, they almost became catatonic.
This is exactly wrong, or unless everyone does not include good scientists and engineers who only think that things are nutty if the concept violates well settled physical principles (of which there have been none since the last revolution in physics - the development of quantum mechanics into 1930s).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.