I think it’s a mix - but to read what being said and my understanding - is it’s both, he is “Clown”, infiltrated no such agency - but did it for what he thought was the right reason and now he’s being given a chance to prove that. Meaning that Snowden thinks he’s doing the right thing and now it’s clear(er) what the actual purpose was for what he was doing (taking down no such agency vs. exposing wrongdoing therein = Obama 720 abuse) - but Snowden believer in latter - and if/as so, then he should come forward and lay it on the table, before the tribunal @ Gitmo.
OOps I meant to type 702 abuse (that’s what Snowden was exposing, he was used to take down no such agency - if that was the case, then we’d like to hear more about that!)
What do you think Snowden has to offer besides his own actions in past events. Surely he doesn’t still have access to intel?