I really didn’t mean to cause you to be so emotional.
Haha. I'm gonna put on my troll goggles. I hate getting head-pop juice in my eyes.
This challenge to your intelligence has to do with the following assertion: that your stated belief about Q is based on a weak intuition.
So I’m asking you to show specifics.
When we develop an intuition about something as a result of experiencing that type of thing repeatedly over a long period of time, it’s still only intuition and as such can be inaccurate. The thing to do is test our intuition with concrete methods.
Explain in general terms the method you use to conclude Q is a fraud. Unless you have no method and are relying only on intuition. And of course you have every right to do this.
But it would mean your case is very weak.
This was actually an interesting discussion before you started ODing on ad hominems.