Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Strac6

This challenge to your intelligence has to do with the following assertion: that your stated belief about Q is based on a weak intuition.

So I’m asking you to show specifics.

When we develop an intuition about something as a result of experiencing that type of thing repeatedly over a long period of time, it’s still only intuition and as such can be inaccurate. The thing to do is test our intuition with concrete methods.

Explain in general terms the method you use to conclude Q is a fraud. Unless you have no method and are relying only on intuition. And of course you have every right to do this.

But it would mean your case is very weak.


565 posted on 02/10/2018 10:09:18 AM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith; Strac6

‘Explain in general terms the method you use to conclude Q is a fraud.’

It’s a trap!

If we ‘argue,’ against Q it means we’re trolls and worse—much, much worse. No one is allowed to undercut Q’s presumption of validity. The only people who do so are ‘paid disrupters.’

Don’t take the bait. You’ll be reported to TPTB if you do.


569 posted on 02/10/2018 10:15:37 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith; Fantasywriter
I am now ready to make my judgement.

I have studied this thread thoroughly and have cocluded that Reasonisfaith is way more highly intelligent than Fantasywriter.

Congratulations, Reasonisfaith.

571 posted on 02/10/2018 10:20:15 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith

Your lack of intelligence is shown by by your very definition of the term “intelligence.” Intelligence is “the ability to acquire and use knowledge and skills.” What you are asking for is research and reportage, and my old paralegal’s fee for that would be $450 an hour. She will be glad to take your VISA or Amex if you are already not over your $200 credit limit.

Speaking of knowledge, I do have the knowledge that Q has never reported anything that was not already in the public domain when reported or couched in such loose terms that the post could have been interpreted to mean dozens of things.

As an example, one post told everyone to “watch next week,”.... and something happened the next week!

Exactly what was to happen was not revealed by the all-knowing “Q”, but since some additional memos were released in DC, Congress was in session, there was a traffic accident within a mile of the White House, and Bush 43’s daughter’s cat took a krep, the Q believers are self-vindicated that SOMETHING HAPPENED!!!

Here is the bottom line. If you really want to ask us to believe Q posts, then put your money where your mouth is.

If you are right, it would be the easiest $100K you ever make.

Put up or Shut up.


573 posted on 02/10/2018 10:24:37 AM PST by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson