More importantly, you misrepresented everything I posted. That does you no credit.
Huh. Post 275 openly gives the link to your prior post about another site which you braggingly relied upon to discredit Q.
It gives your OWN link to that other site.
It gives a direct cut-and-paste from the other site with the information about who posted and the timestamp of that link.
That is NOT misrepresenting.
This is the post that misrepresented my every word, and could barely fit all the insults into the space allotted:
grey_whiskers to Fantasywriter
‘Yes, you are a troll.
I explicitly mentioned the thread, and pointed out that all references to Q were put in as unflattering a light as possible.
You then deign to act like I avoided the subject, and try to tell me that the posts in that thread talk about theories from Q’s supporters.
And then you go on and on about 4chan, as though that site is esoteric and only *you* have heard of it.
And yet you blather on in vague second hand generalities; you are obviously re-telling the canned arguments of others which you have no direct experience with, nor the intellect to understand.
The 4chan argument about the photo from the Pentagon...*snerk*. The point was the individual who posted it, not vaguely “the Pentagon” : and within a day or so of Q’s post. That argument derives from vague hand-waving and the strawman of “obscurity” in that the photo was supposed to have been so unusual, that its posting was its own guarantee of authenticity. But it was the proximity in *time*, and the other individual who Tweeted it, that constituted the significance.
Q said it best about you and your ilk: “These people are stupid.”’
[It would take me literally all day to address all the lies. But on the fly, here are two.
One: on the same link I posted there were several Q-believers. Overall—taking all 4 pp into account—it balanced out relatively well. You quoted from one of the skeptics, but there were a number of staunch defenders as well.
That was pure bilge about me and 4Chan. I never even mentioned visiting the site. I said the centipedes at The_Donald monitor 4Chan/pol like hawks—which is true. I’m grateful for the ‘pedes. There’s so much I’d know little or nothing about if it weren’t for them; they’re a simply incredible resource.]