I think I have that. If you read the entire thread some dots were connected all on our freeper own. I believe it all but confirms Q's authenticity.
Why do I support him so strongly? read my above post. Because I will risk any risk, fight any fight, be called a kookoo bird, if it will help, in even the smallest way, to save this country I love. My ancestors made this country and I don't want to be the one that loses it.
I think you should consider taking a chance and joining me. Its not a lot to ask, considering the reward.
If it all turns out to be a hoax, you can laugh at me and call me dipshit. I won't even get mad. In the meantime, let's get to work.
Whaddya think?
I think I read somewhere that Corsi is asserting that the USA really did get Assange to Switzerland and that POTUS will bring him back to the USA—evidently on Air Force 1. Sounds great, to me.
Whaddya think?
I think your heart's in the right place and that, taken at face value, you are a patriot.
I heard of Q, here on FR, just a few days ago. I, too, have been digging, researching to see if I can find any reason that I should believe he/she/they are legit and on our side.
So far, I haven't found anything concrete that's been predicted that paid off later. I started with just the basics. He is supposed to be so named because of the security clearance he has and shares with only the highest cleared folks like the president himself. I know some things about security clearances and am not aware of a "Q" security clearance that the president would have. "Q" is a clearance that exists only within the Department of Energy, and is only equivalent to a "Top Secret" (TS) clearance. Maybe (TS/SCI) which is not all that unique.
So far, if I can't verify something even that basic, without being referred to, by people who've been on FR for only a couple of years or a couple of days, as a troll or disruptor or "Q denier", I'm not exactly sold.
I've been around here for a while, and I've seen this kind of crap, here, before; where a substantial number of people follow someone, who claims to have inside knowledge of things in high places, down the rabbit hole. Only to be burned and made fools of later.
Why does he have to be so cryptic? Why can't he make a specific prediction about something? (A post from 14 months ago that references 7 people in a secret meeting...that is now "verified" by a mention in a text message regarding a secret society is pretty thin "verification"). Why are you still looking for a shred of information that would make you a true believer?
I'm not sold. I'm increasingly less and less so.