Q drop #597 (FBI:first meeting of "secret society" on the night Trump won election)

qcodefag.github.io ^ | 1/23/2018 | Q Anon

[ransomnote]

Image of Q drop #597 (Jan 23 2018 17:26:55) The image has a large black banner bordering the text so most will have to scroll down to see it. Phone users may have to hunt.

[raiderboy]

We Arrest him. Who is he? The lone ranger?

[bagster]

Awwwwwww....gracias, migo.

You're a fine fellow after all.

Now please stop disrupting Q threads all over town. This aint a Charger game, homie.

:)

[grey_whiskers]

I’ve never read Corsi on Q. I go to 8chan and to reddit.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

Maybe Q arrests whoever he wants to.

Nobody messes with Q..

Q doesn’t need a horse.

Q is also more than one person probably.

Lone Ranger wasn’t alone either, he had Tonto.

[boxlunch]

While the Black hats were spying on the good guys, it’s good to know the white hats were spying back on the black hats at the same time. Its all so surreal. I hope they are starting to realize this and getting really really nervous.

[bagster]

Robert Mueller, James Comey, Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, John Brennan, James Clapper, Leon Panetta, Phill Mud, David Petraeus, Michael Hayden & former Attorney General Eric Holder.”

If I read things right, MN. Those people were at the December meeting. We should focus on the November 14 disclosure about the "seven guys". If Q put that out first, it is very close to SOLIDLY confirming Qs authenticity. He would have been the first to talk about a day after the election meeting and name the number of guys at the meeting.

This would go a long way to confounding and convincing people like golden eagle, raider boy and many others. I would like that very much.

Am I right or wrong about this? If I'm an idiot, tell me. I can take it.

[bagster]

OMG that's PERFECT!!!!!

You'll have a Pulitzer for this, Jimmy Olson!!!!

[Becki]

It was not mentioned anywhere to my knowledge. Everything I saw regarding that time period was chaos in the Dem circles.

I have only been following Q for a few weeks and had to search to find the original.

Ransomnote may know more than I do.

[boxlunch]

Hehehe (sweeping bow). I had to google how to post an image haha. Glad it didnt turn out super huge or something

[bagster]

I'm not asserting that the Q post from December validates him as an insider -

I'm asserting that the November 14 Q drop describing the night after the election meeting of seven guys does.

What say you?

[raiderboy]

Little children loved the lone ranger. And they seem to love the q. Who is the q and why does she call herself “ q”. I would pick anoher letter.

[bagster]

I'm very proud of you boxlunch. If there is any justice, that meme will live forever in Q loredom. Hold onto it for when you're famous.

:)

[bagster]

And they seem to love the q.

Are you sad that people don't love you? It's not true. I love you, manolito.

Come give tio bagster a beso.

[boxlunch]

Cant take credit except for finding the image and posting. From the old Mad magazine Spy vs Spy cartoons. Does fit the scenario well though.

[bagster]

Kind of shocking to see Petreaus’s name there.

More shocking to see Holder's name, to me. Wasn't he out by then?

[bagster]

Yes you can take credit. I know what spy v spy is. Its the appropriateness and the message that makes it awesome sauce. SO perfect. It describes the whole black hat v white hat in th3 best cartoon way possible. At least for us geezers who remember spy v spy. F the millennials.

[bagster]

Q wanted us to make memes. You made a great one. If you could figure out a way to put a great sentence into it, you could rule the world with that meme.

[neverevergiveup]

Thanks, all of you. I’m sorry I came across that way (defeatist). I’m not. Just need to get some sleep, and maybe a run in the morning. Goodnight all!

[Guardian Sebastian]

Maybe when it is tweeting?

[bagster]

I have yet to see on this thread any disclosure of a secret and guarded meeting the night after the election earlier than November 14. I believe there was not. If we have a sleuth who can provide an earlier mention of it from another source, then I am wrong. If I am right, and the meeting on that date with that number of people, that is hardcore confirmation that Q is an insider. Isn't it?

The informant has that information. Only an insider would be privy to it at this point. And Q knew about it on November 14. How? He must be VERY inside. Top level.