Hey, it's "baked in." What do you expect me to do about it?
What “both parties”?
Define “everything.”
Have they ‘baked-in” the indictments almost certain to fly over Obama spying on Trump, not to mention the Clinton Foundation (and that one’s being done with a Grand Jury in Little Rock - not exactly the best place for her)? I don’t think so.
As to your request, maybe remind people that a LOT can happen in 10 months.
By they way, are these not the SAME PEOPLE who predicted the Republican ‘disaster’ in 2016? My goodness, I think so.
Get out and vote instead of cowering into a ball and posting defeatist articles to this forum.
Worked in November 2016.
Wait ,is this a Distraction from Turban Durbin and his lies
I don’t believe it for a minute. They talk like it is assumed, a done-deal. Baloney.
I thought Axe was a teenage boy underarm deodorant.
I didn’t know they did the news, too.
Well, what are the 40 seats they will win?
If everyone is so sure, shouldn’t we know who they are?
Gotta love our Repubs. We gave them everyhing and they managed to eff it all up.
The rats are sleazy, immoral crooks, but they use that to their advantage.
The repubs are also sleazy, immoral crooks. However, they are also too stupid to use the sleaze and immorality to their advantage and would rather just lick the rats’ ani (heh, make believe plural of you know what) and feed off of what is left for them.
I really loathe both parties and hope that CW-II does them both in.
How did the GOPe fair after Watergate? Now, how do you think the Rats will fair after TreasonGate?
I would agree partially with parts of this fantasy writing...
...I would agree that Nasty Pelosi is ‘baked’.
She used to spout ‘half baked’, socialist ideas but now, her mind seems very much ‘baked’. She should have gone into a nursing home about 15 years ago.
Someone forgot to tell the Voters
Axios is a liberal site.
Wait for the IG report. It could destroy all things dem for years.
Both Mitch and Nancy are hoping for it.
>>I know folks will say “the experts were wrong about 2016” to rebut this, but everything does seem to point to a Dem house.
If you eliminate “experts” who quote each other to prove a point, what exactly is the “everything” that points to a Dem House?
Absurd & Unsupported Statement Alert!
In other words: HOGWASH!
Hey, it's "baked in." What do you expect me to do about it?
Pubbies need to grow “some” and Mitch has to kill the cloture filibuster by returning to the Mr. Smith rules. Get the floor, make your point, let the chips fall. No game playing - win by civil discourse of the facts and truth, not political strategery.
“And, thanks to series of recent developments, Trump knows this no longer just seems plausible, but probable.”
Writer never gets around to describing the recent developments. He couldn’t finish writing his piece if had been forced to mention something, because the rest of the article depends on that sentence.
“But Democratic momentum looks like it could drench the map.”
Drench? As in what the witch was supposed to have done? Americans are royally infuriated at Trump because he refuses to allow a third world invasion, or he chooses to protect the country, or implement tax cuts? Or MAGA? Yep, that’s it. Americans want to be third world. To hell with prosperity and health and happiness.
Impeachment? On what charge? Even if he is impeached 2/3 of the Senate must vote to convict. Then the VP becomes POTUS. Are they going to impeach and convict him too? What charges? What do they think the general public will do during the show trials?