John Soloman is arguably the best investigative reporter in the country right now, which you should be aware of, whether he made a mistake there or not.
But that is not material to the question you asked, which the rest of the article addresses. What specifically do you dispute, or do you believe that Mueller and McCabe and Rosenstein all supposedly running this investigation that ultimately led to uranium transfers to Russia if not Iran was all above board?
It's an article by a guy who you call the "best investigative reporter in the country." It references "Justice Department documents" but doesn't have any links to them or titles for them.
And if he can't get the simplest, most easily verifiable fact about Rosenstein correct, then what exactly makes you think anything else there is accurate?
I'm looking for something that would stand up as evidence -- not an article with vague references to unnamed documents. Even if everything he has said here is true, there is nothing here that is any more credible than an "unnamed source."