Posted on 12/10/2017 5:08:23 PM PST by Elderberry
In an interview last Friday with “Freedom Friday” host Carl Gallups, Obama birth-certificate lead investigator Mike Zullo revealed for the first time that the “Deep State” prevented a federal investigation of his findings, compiled over a 5+-year period, that the “long-form” birth certificate image posted by the Obama White House in 2011 is a “computer-generated forgery.”
Virtually unknown in the United States prior to the election of Donald J. Trump last year, the term “Deep State” has now been invoked by some newscasters, journalists and commentators as well as by Trump himself through his Twitter account. Left-leaning news outlets reluctantly discussed it beginning in early March, after Trump claimed on Twitter that he and his campaign aides had been “wiretapped” during the final months of the presidential campaign.
On March 9, 2017, Politico Magazine declared, “The Deep State Is a Figment of Steve Bannon’s Imagination,” referring to then-White House Senior Adviser Steve Bannon, now Editor-in-Chief at Breitbart News.
The article begins, featuring a photo of Bannon:
Here’s a handy rule for assessing the credibility of what you’re reading about national security in the Trump era: If somebody uses the term “Deep State,” you can be pretty sure they have no idea what they’re talking about.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
‘What did the Dunhams or Paynes say or do that is contrary to the information provided on the certificate of live birth and the long-form birth certificate?’
In all my years of reading Obot comments, that is the single stupidest one of all. The competition was stiff, as Obots are prone to say stupid things. But you won hands down. It’s incredible that you were willing to humiliate yourself by posting it even once, much less twice.
The Dunhams never set eyes on the child until the daughter showed up in Hawaii with a toddler in 1963, after she changed her name to Ann Dunham Obama in January.
I posted this excerpt way back, I'll repeat it here, although the source has been scrubbed:
Conspiracy To Defraud The System.SOURCE
EXCERPT:
...The first task in need of explanation is why would Hawaii aid a known illegal of British birth in illegally obtaining a fake birth certificate? The answer is in 1961 the American public had not yet been herded by Teddy Kennedy and socialists into providing welfare benefits to illegals. Hawaii had a large population of illegals who were slave labor, but were a huge burden to the system in poverty and crime.
The Hawaiian answer, as it was a Democratic state and still is was to start registering all those foreign kids by the thousands. The purpose being to tap into all those federal hundreds of millions then which would profit the state. See all of those poverty programs flowed funds into the pockets of the retailers as the golden goose pipeline. If one makes citizens out of illegals, then Hawaii converts a debt into their asset in obtaining more funds and growing the socialist system which empowers Democratic liberals.
The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of Barack Obama’s registered in Hawaii. Do you think even a Republican governor sitting on this explosive mess wants any of this coming out? An entire state sold out the United States for filthy lucre, because they were importing Asian slave labor. That does not make a great headline, nor, did they probably ever expect a money train welfare illegal would somehow get hisself installed as President which would expose the entire Hawaiian fraud, and you know very well that all of those records would have to be gone through and verified so an Obama repeat would not occur, in all 50 states...
195 posted on 21/08/2009 12:16:46 PM by Fred Nerks
The one thing you can count on that never fails; they are lazy, they repeat from the script they are all slavishly taught to follow, and NEVER have an original thought, neither do they EVER DO ANY INDEPENDANT RESEARCH.
Agree completely—both when it comes to the hardwired talking points that constitute the limits of Obot thinking, and also re the motivation and means by which HI transformed their illegal immigrant liability into an asset. That perfectly explains why Obama had a notation in the archives but no original LFBC or legal SS#. He is a product of fraud and he maintained his viability by deceit.
Obama’s ‘legacy,’ speaks for itself: it is that of a foreign-born America-hater. Trump has his hands full trying to salvage whatever is left of the country. If he succeeds, it will be in part by fundamentally altering the judiciary. Obama’s judges are leftwing radicals, and he had 8 yrs to pack the courts with them.
“You used the word obfuscation for a reason.”
Affirmative:
To obfuscate something means to make it so that it isn’t clear or transparent, much like dirty water makes it hard to see to the bottom of a pond.
Yes, the nonexistent and withheld records for the entire ‘fairy tale’ family iare as transparent as mud.
“still doubt that Stanley Ann Dunham is the mother of Barack Obama?”
Riddle me this?
Does a son visit his mother when she is dying?
Does a son attend his mother’s funeral?
Does a mother attend her son’s high school graduation? College graduation? Law school graduation?
Does a mother safeguard records (school documents, BC, hospital, passport, insurance, photographs) of her son?
There must have been some kind of fire or flood or hurricane in 1990 when he entered politics and it all got destroyed. LOL.
You are posting to the person who asked the most idiotic question ever posed on an eligibility thread:
“What did the Dunhams or Paynes say or do that is contrary to the information provided on the certificate of live birth and the long-form birth certificate?”
Further interaction runs the risk of lowering your IQ.
Merry Christmas.
Why are all the records fabricated, hidden or unavailable? I suggest that you search FR for earlier threads regarding this conflict. It has been evident that his declared life history is not verifiable.
The earliest known claims of ancestry were relayed by his mates at the Punahou Day School. He claimed to be royalty- the son of an Indonesian King and a foreign actress.
Trust me, no one here is foolish enough to swallow anything concocted by a NY Slimes propagandist.
If you are tossing out random falsehoods in an effort to salve your wounded pride, it’s not working. Say whatever you like about people who are merely seeking the truth; it won’t change the fact that you posted the most imbecilic comment on the thread...twice.
“Follow the school records.”
What records does one reference?
His mother’s nonexistent HS yearbook?
His missing elementary school files from Hawaii?
His Barry Soetoro single page record from Indonesia?
His altered Punahou HS yearbook?
His missing Occidental, Columbia & Harvard college records?
There were no school records... or birth, marriage or death records to check for this family.
From an Empty Crib to an Empty Chair.
Who would spend a NY minute on Scott’s book since it revealed absolutely nothing of importance. And that is the gist of the argument, there is NOTHING to find. The NYT reporter was handsomely paid to elaborate about NOTHING.
According to the review, the very same controversial holes that are apparent in the original ‘family’ narrative as told by Zero remain as gaping holes. No one attests to a relationship between Miss Ann and Mr.Obama- much less a family with a child.
There are no witnesses to a senior Barack Obama interacting with a Miss Ann in 1960: no courtship for the marriage and no one recalls a baby or kid. (But it’s whispered that, “they reportedly married on the island of Maui.”)
Undocumented people, relationships, weddings, births and deaths. Undocumented education. At least they are consistent.
Just as Slick Willy said, “it’s the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever heard.”
That noob is 100% for sure a troll. Means they’re a bit worried.
Scott’s book wasn’t a total bust. She did reveal that Obama Jr never unearthed any trace of his parents’ supposed marriage. That’s worth something, right, Pete?
‘In any event, Dreams claims that “how and when” Ann’s and Obama Sr.’s “marriage occurred remains a bit murky,” and according to Janny Scott’s 2011 Obama biography A Singular Woman, “whatever happened happened fast” when Ann “dropped out of school” after the fall 1960 “semester ended[,] and [she] married [Obama Sr.] that winter so discreetly...that her son never unearthed a single trace of the event.”’
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/03/in_name_only.html
The truth should not be so complicated and obscured. After so many lies have been discovered, every word of his books should be considered to be a lie to support a false narrative until proven otherwise.
Repeat- There are no school records available. Post a link to back up your claims or it never happened.
Columbia University New York: A reporter interviewed every member of his declared graduating class and could not find a soul who knew him, including the head of the political science department.
Friends in Seattle remember the mom and her baby, but they have the year wrong. Sounds like liberals desperately trying to uphold the false narrative for their dear leader.
As their stories changed to support the official narrative, their credibility came into question.
Are you claiming that he was raised in Seattle? Add it to the mix!
Hawaii, New England, Indonesia, Chicago, Kenya?
It’s a crap shoot.
Learn the TRUTH and quit swallowing their vomit. You are five - ten years behind the story.
We Have Been Duped: The Story
By Don Wilkie
The American people have been duped. We are victims of an organized campaign to give legitimacy to a fable. The fable concerns Barack Obama’s origins — the “improbable love” his parents shared. This fable proved so captivating that four years after he told it at the 2004 Democratic Convention, the American people elected the storyteller to the presidency of the United States.
The fairy-tale is found in the pages of Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father. When Obama began his campaign, there were very few sources that could verify the story told within its pages. Most of the central characters had died, including the mother, father, and maternal grandfather. The maternal grandmother who died shortly before the 2008 election was kept sequestered and was allowed to talk to the press only if the reporter had a “minder” from the Obama camp.
There were others, though, who proclaimed that the fable was true. These were friends of father Barack Obama, Sr. in Hawaii and friends of mother Ann Dunham in Seattle. Their recollections mirror the fable found in Dreams. In light of what we know today, much of what these friends have attested to is simply impossible. If we accept that the friends are not delusional, that they are able to tell the difference between fact and fiction, then they must have been intentionally falsifying their memories to protect the fable in Dreams......(snip).....
Since the 2008 election, several inconvenient truths have emerged that prove that the story in Dreams is a fable....(snip)...
Abercrombie and the snack bar crowd’s recollections mirror the fictional story in Dreams as far as Obama Sr. is concerned. But to truly sell the fiction in Dreams to the public, witnesses were needed to testify about the activities of mother Ann.
Ann’s Friends in Seattle
The two people who have supplied the most information about Ann Dunham are her two Mercer Island high school friends: Susan Botkin Blake and Maxine Box. The easiest way to understand their prevarications is to analyze the story they tell of Ann’s “visit” to Seattle. There are at least three versions:....(snip)......
Careful historian Maraniss might more accurately be described as an “enabling dissembler.”
By looking at the three versions of the “visit,” it is clear that as conflicting facts have been discovered, recollections have been conveniently modified to fit them. From the initial version of a young woman, “crazy in love,” stopping off in Seattle in 1961 on her way to see her beloved in Boston, who by the way wouldn’t be in Boston for another year, we find out that the “visit” really happened a year later in August 1962 — and when it becomes clear that Ann moved to Seattle and was never on her way to see her husband in Boston, we wind up with a totally innocuous story reset to 1961 of two friends visiting one afternoon for an amiable chat.
It is clear that people are lying. It is clear they are lying to protect a fraudulent story. It is clear that the official Obama nativity story is bunkum. Those who have orchestrated this cover-up should be ashamed of themselves for trying to fool us.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/10/we_have_been_duped_the_story.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.