You keep saying I want to believe it. You never specify what I want to believe. Nevertheless, what you’re doing is called “assigning motives.” It’s as unhealthy a psychological practice as you’ll find anywhere. Nor does it speak well of your ability to carry on a discussion based on facts and logic.
Carpenter went on a tweet-deleting spree of epic proportions. Look it up. If her tweets were innocent, why did she delete them like a house on fire?
According to Hotair, Carpenter admitted to the matching tattoos. I guess Hotair just “wanted to believe it,” too?
Unfortunately for you, she denies it.
Amanda Carpenter: No, I didn't have an affair with Ted Cruz
Note this from Cruz's official Twitter pages (one his and one his Senate page.) Note that both have the famous Twitter blue check, meaning verified as the real page.
Now, take note of this as well:
Note again the blue check.
Also note that there are several "Amanda Carpenter" pages, none of which has the blue check except that official one.
Now note that neither the Cruz page posted on this thread nor the Carpenter page posted are so marked.
How do you explain that? But none of that matters to you, does it?
Amanda Carpenter: No, I didn't have an affair with Ted Cruz
Note this from Cruz's official Twitter pages (one his and one his Senate page.) Note that both have the famous Twitter blue check, meaning verified as the real page.
Now, take note of this as well:
Note again the blue check.
Also note that there are several "Amanda Carpenter" pages, none of which has the blue check except that official one.
Now note that neither the Cruz page posted on this thread nor the Carpenter page posted are so marked.
How do you explain that? But none of that matters to you, does it?