I would doubt that BroJoeK would call himself an expert, any more than I would call myself an expert. I consider myself widely read on the subject but I also freely admit that there are far more learned individuals on this forum than I am. BroJoeK has his beliefs and opinions, and if he truly believes the North fought to end slavery then I would respectfully disagree with him.
DoodleDawg: "I would doubt that BroJoeK would call himself an expert, any more than I would call myself an expert.
I consider myself widely read on the subject.."
Correct.
DoodleDawg: "BroJoeK has his beliefs and opinions, and if he truly believes the North fought to end slavery then I would respectfully disagree with him."
I'm not trying to exaggerate the role of slavery, simply to prevent our partisan pro-Confederates from denying that it was important, to both sides.
The question is: how important?
The answer is: very important as demonstrated by:
Sure, super-sharp hair-splitting lawyers might claim: "Civil War was not about slavery", but nobody at the time made such arguments.
They all understood intuitively what it was.