Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
Sounds like a mere updating of the basic shuttle concept. Reusable glider. Meh.
11 posted on 11/14/2017 8:09:59 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard
...and with a bit more engineering, they'll be able to return it to orbit just two weeks after landing.

(it's a joke - that's how the Space Shuttle was originally sold)

16 posted on 11/14/2017 8:14:46 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: hinckley buzzard
"Sounds like a mere updating of the basic shuttle concept. Reusable glider. Meh. "

This is what the Space Shuttle should have been - a small, reusable craft to get men up to and back from low-earth orbit.

We already had plenty of heavy lifters for getting cargo up there. Safe, reliable and CHEAP. But no, we had to throw them out and start all over with a wonderfully expensive, brand new project that could spread the $$$ all over many, many Congressional districts.

Billions (maybe trillions?) of dollars wasted. Years wasted. Lives wasted. And now 40 years later we're finally getting around to doing what we should have done back then.
25 posted on 11/14/2017 9:01:09 PM PST by Garth Tater (Gone Galt and I ain't coming back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: hinckley buzzard

That depends on how far they’ve been able to reduce the costs of reusing it.


32 posted on 11/15/2017 12:17:17 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson