Full title:
Catfights over handbags and tears in the toilets. When this producer launched a women-only TV company she thought she'd kissed goodbye to conflict...
DANG!
Because women never have conflict?
LOL!
The pic at the site shows that Samantha Brick is built like a brick——house. Yoicks!
Based on my bigoted stereotypes, I felt justified in in discriminating against men in the workplace...
It would be treated as a crime if the shoe was on the other foot.
Too funny. Having grown up in a family of five girls I could’ve advised her on the stupidity of her initial premise. But she wouldn’t have listened anyway.
Many years ago, I worked in an office where I was the token male. I witnessed the behavior described in this article. There were days when I sensed that I needed to proceed directly to my office.
Gender issues aside, this was a horribly-managed company.
Even a suggestion that we start a men-only business or club would get us banned from polite society for life.
This is hilarious
When I saw “TV Company”, I thought maybe Sylvania was coming back.
This isn’t at all surprising if you’ve ever been around groups of women.
The big issue with women in the workplace is that women tend to take things very personally, and are more likely to hold a grudge for a long time over real or imagined slights. This can be corrosive to a work environment.
But God help you if you are a man and upset a woman. They will ALL gang up on you.
Women can be incredibly catty
The viciousness of women to women is incredible.
Women are drama period
And now victims
We live in a fake bubble of reality were women think they are as capable or even more capable than men
Ahh.. the non-existent Utopia of a place controlled by women.
They seem to forget that women have claws, and that in order to represent the furies and the harpies, the greeks chose women :)
They also chose women as goddesses... vengeful, petty and jealous goddesses.
The image of a nurturing woman, working in harmony and mentoring other women is just a very small aspect of womanhood.
The title alone made me burst out laughing. I didn’t even need to read the article.
This fool obviously doesn’t have children.
She also ignored or overlooked the female fights and moral bullying that goes on regularly.
Stay at home mothers say working mothers neglect their children, while working women say stay at home mothers betray the cause and are poor role models.
If you don’t breastfeed, there are moral bullies that will lecture you for not doing so and hector you no matter your excuse - though they’ve never given birth or don’t work outside the home.
Hit toddlerhood, and women accuse others of child abuse for spanking or not feeding organic food to everyone’s children. “You’re giving my baby poisons!” Discipline your child for bad behavior, be told you’re bad yourself. Don’t discipline the child or not in the way others agree with, you’re abusing/neglecting the child.
If you can’t afford or simply choose not to constantly ferry your school age child to many different activities, it is called neglect - it is a failure to develop a well rounded child.
That’s aside from the liberal bullies who readily smear conservative women as stupid little puppets of their husbands if they speak up in public or traitors to womenhood if they are conservative on their own.
The evil of identity politics - you aren’t really a member of X group unless you’re liberal, so they abuse you the way they say conservatives abuse members of the group. They do what they accuse others of doing. And it is harsh, and has been for years.
The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/03/the-four-stages-of-conservative-female-abuse/
TLDR: If the ignorant fool had children, she’d know how mean other mothers are to each other and often wrap it in a moral mantle to make it acceptable.
Kind of like what social justice bullies do to everyone else, but for the sake of various oppressed groups instead of “for the children”.