she didn’t want to go to the Inauguration, but she went because “W” decided to go??? Really???
Does this “fill in the blank” woman, ever do anything because she makes up her own mind about what she will do?? Is everything based on, can we say, appearances, or what she perceives as people’s expectations?
So if “W” hadn’t gone, she would have her excuse? Really? The smartest woman in the world, she who is so rough and tough , hides behind “W” and his decision to attend????
This sound like such horse blank to me.
Well put. The most brilliant, most talented, toughest woman in the world decides she has to attend because Bush is going? This is the woman who was going to stand up to all the world’s bad guys. This is beyond laughable.
She deserves all the scorn and derision that can possibly be heaped upon her. What a whining loser.
The cumulative effect of her yammering like this is (hopefully) bad for all Democrats.
It sounds strange to me as well. Has the loser always attended the inauguration?
The answer is no.
McGovern did not attend Nixon’s in 1973:
http://www.nytimes.com/1973/01/14/archives/mcgovern-will-miss-inauguration-of-nixon.html
It looks like Mondale was a no-show in 1985:
http://articles.latimes.com/1985-01-17/news/mn-7700_1_mondale
Dukakis didn’t show in 1989:
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/21/us/the-41st-president-a-disappointed-dukakis-wishes-bush-well.html
Romney did not attend in 2013:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/mitt-romney-president-obama-inauguration-article-1.1244471