Posted on 10/12/2017 11:53:48 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Every security guard in the state of Nevada has to register as an armed or unarmed guard with the state’s Private Investigator’s Licensing Board (PILB). This entity’s records are publicly searchable at: nevadapilb.glsuite.us.
There’s no Jesus Campos licensed with the PILB.
Earlier this week we found out that Campos was shot before the shooter started firing on the crowd below at the music festival in Las Vegas. Before this revelation we were told that the security guard, Jesus Campos, stopped the killer from murdering more people when he approached the killer’s room in Vegas.
Now we find out that the security guard is not even a registered security guard in Nevada!
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
“Jesus” may be a middle name and he goes by that instead of his first name.
I’d check on that before jumping to conclusions.
Looks to me like he goes by his middle name. His first name is Larry.
Possibly because state law requires it?
I think I am going to be saying I TOLD YOU SO in a little bit.
I love Gateway pundit but all freepers should know this story originated here.
originally it was here, our people found that out.
Also seen posted (with a screenshot) that Campos was NOT listed as an employee of MGM.
One story (haven’t seen verified) is he was working with the festival and was doing a random walkthrough. Seems like a stretch.
I posted yesterday (with photos) that armed guards and now posted outside Campos’ home. To protect him, or keep him locked down? Dunno.
It just might be time to put Jesus on the Polygraph. Wait a minute, that just didn’t sound right.
Well then was he an employee of the Mandalay?
CA....
MGM owns Mandalay and he was not an employee in their database. A reporter checked.
Shooter also checked in a few days before the ‘official’ timeline.
Now that you mention it, he does look a lot like the guy on the right.
Well, there is an “Albert J. Campos” right there in the screenshot. Ever consider that maybe “Jesus” is a middle name he chooses to go by?
If the streets are wet, it doesn't necessarily mean its raining.
Just because he wasn't registered, it doesn't automatically mean he wasn't even an employee of the hotel.
Speculative (but entirely reasonable) explanation of the day: Campos wasn't registered, but still worked as a guard.
Much ado about nuttin.
Very likely security guards in Nevada are permitted to carry a side arm. Campos and those working security at MGM Mandalay don’t.
In fact two employee’s were on the 32nd floor when Paddock started shooting. One was a maintainence worker the other working security. Their presence might have caused Paddock to go off his schedule. But it does look like management screwed up and delayed calling the cops.
Also see a “Larry (or Lany?) Jesus Campos” on the list...
“Is it possible that Jesus Campos’ official job title wasn’t “security guard”?”
However he runs things, it’s gotta be quiet. Let him hide upstairs in the office. Say he’s the janitor, I don’t give a s***. But, please, whatever job he takes, make sure it’s something quiet. (Casino quote)
I am aware the state law requirement. But that does not answer the question. Why would a security guard need a PI license? Most state PI license requirements are there to address the reliability of rendering evidence or expert testimony in court. For example, if you are a cyber security investigator and might be called to court to testify on a security breach, then in many states, you are required to have a PI license.
From that perspective, there is little to no need for a PI license for a security guard. If the purpose is to track bouncers or other security officers, then I would think that a different set of “controls” would be appropriate. I would speculate that “bouncer/security” laws would sheild the individual from certain civil penalties or perhaps even grant quasi-police powers. But I would expect such controls to include background checks, training on apprehension, police procedures, etc. Does Nevada require that under their PI license? If they do, that would seem overkill for the actual private investigator (cyber security example from above).
Now if the purpose is to restrict employment, prop up salaries, etc Ok, perhaps that is a reasonable position.
I guess the better phrasing of the question would be: What state interest is served by requiring a security guard to have a PI license?
Just does not make sense to me - maybe someone can explain it.
MGM owns a lot of things, and many of them are subsidiary companies that wouldn't have their employees listed in MGM's database.
Maybe his title is "illegal alien" and that's why he's not on any lists.
You have a truly weird obsession about “blog pimps.” Whatever floats your boat, but it is weird.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.