Uh-oh. Hefner had a co-conspirator.
To: sparklite2
To: sparklite2
But did he put her head on a man or a woman’s body? Mona might have been feeling like a Monty that day.
3 posted on
09/28/2017 3:49:58 PM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
To: sparklite2
Little did people know, that he painted a Lesbian version:

4 posted on
09/28/2017 3:50:15 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: sparklite2
There’s a theory floating around out there that young women’s fashion in those days exposed one breast, because that is the way young women are portrayed in so many paintings of the era. I think there would be mention of it in writings of the time if that were the case, however.
6 posted on
09/28/2017 3:52:13 PM PDT by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: sparklite2
What a titillating development.
9 posted on
09/28/2017 3:54:50 PM PDT by
Bon mots
(Laughing at liberal tears!)
To: sparklite2
11 posted on
09/28/2017 3:56:39 PM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: sparklite2
To: sparklite2
This should inspire Dan Brown to write a new bs novel named The Da Vinci Ho.
15 posted on
09/28/2017 4:05:59 PM PDT by
Vision Thing
(You see the depths of our hearts, and You love us the same...)
To: sparklite2
Da Vinci might have painted topless version of Mona Lisa He should be referred to as Leonardo da Vinci, or simply Leonardo. He didn't have a last name in the modern sense. Vinci is a place name.
To: sparklite2
Now we know why she’s smiling.
To: sparklite2
Are they warm, are they real, Mona Lisa?
25 posted on
09/28/2017 5:49:35 PM PDT by
Rastus
To: sparklite2
A topless version of a woman depicted by an artist of the era of Leonardo da Vinci would not have been rare event.
34 posted on
09/29/2017 10:02:41 AM PDT by
Wuli
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson