Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ETL

perhaps y9u didn’t read your post ....

“Alternative views are also presented here. These views are not generally accepted by mainstream physics,”


22 posted on 09/14/2017 12:37:05 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator

Correct, which is why I had been since preparing to post this...

Wave–particle duality is the concept in quantum mechanics that every particle or quantic entity may be partly described in terms not only of particles, but also of waves. It expresses the inability of the classical concepts “particle” or “wave” to fully describe the behavior of quantum-scale objects. As Albert Einstein wrote:[1]

It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.

Through the work of Max Planck, Einstein, Louis de Broglie, Arthur Compton, Niels Bohr and many others, current scientific theory holds that all particles also have a wave nature (and vice versa).[2] This phenomenon has been verified not only for elementary particles, but also for compound particles like atoms and even molecules. For macroscopic particles, because of their extremely short wavelengths, wave properties usually cannot be detected.[3]

Although the use of the wave-particle duality has worked well in physics, the meaning or interpretation has not been satisfactorily resolved; see Interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Bohr regarded the “duality paradox” as a fundamental or metaphysical fact of nature. A given kind of quantum object will exhibit sometimes wave, sometimes particle, character, in respectively different physical settings. He saw such duality as one aspect of the concept of complementarity.[4] Bohr regarded renunciation of the cause-effect relation, or complementarity, of the space-time picture, as essential to the quantum mechanical account.[5]

Werner Heisenberg considered the question further. He saw the duality as present for all quantic entities, but not quite in the usual quantum mechanical account considered by Bohr. He saw it in what is called second quantization, which generates an entirely new concept of fields which exist in ordinary space-time, causality still being visualizable. Classical field values (e.g. the electric and magnetic field strengths of Maxwell) are replaced by an entirely new kind of field value, as considered in quantum field theory. Turning the reasoning around, ordinary quantum mechanics can be deduced as a specialized consequence of quantum field theory.[6][7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality


23 posted on 09/14/2017 12:39:02 PM PDT by ETL (See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGator

You are right, until a quantum entity such as an electron or proton is observed it exists only within a probability wave. But once it is observed the probability wave aspect of its reality collapses and the entity becomes a particle.


24 posted on 09/14/2017 12:50:46 PM PDT by ETL (See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson