I grasp your inclination, but it’s not going to happen. Here’s why. Stanley Ann was sent to Vancouver to deliver and then relinquish her baby. She threw a wrench in the works when she insisted on keeping him.
Madelyn Dunham returned to HI [there is strong evidence for this in the CCP’s findings] and set about securing US citizenship for her grandson. She succeeded in registering some kind of birth—almost certainly a home birth—and this in turn generated the birth announcements.
This is why, as Tim Adams (among others) confirmed, no BC was on file in HI for Obama. This is also why Obama’s SS# can’t pass e-verify. Granny’s fake registration didn’t generate an official SS#.
Governor Abercrombie summed it up when he stated there was a notation in the file, something, ‘written down’. It was ‘evidence,’ if one didn’t dig too deeply, of a HI birth. (Others mentioned Obama’s “handwritten records,” also. That’s all there was originally.)
There was no impediment between these handwritten records and the issuance of a Certificate of Live Birth. If there was a registered home birth, there was a live birth, so no one batted an eye about putting that record out in public.
The LFBC was more problematic. It required information not included in the handwritten records. You may recall the trumped up charges against HI Health Director Dr. Neal Palafox, which resulted in his abrupt departure. He was replaced by a non-dr, Fuddy. She was happy to approve the LFBC with the added information. Then she conveniently died.
Depts of health routinely issue cut and paste LFBCs in cases of adoption. In that sense what Obama has is not, strictly speaking, a forgery. It’s a far cry from the original handwritten notes, but it’s probably legal. Or if not, then the person best positioned to make that case no longer can; she’s dead.
I believe the truth will eventually come out. But as to a forgery per se, that may not materialize. If that makes sense?
“Depts of health routinely issue cut and paste LFBCs in cases of adoption. In that sense what Obama has is not, strictly speaking, a forgery.”
Sheriff Arpaio says the EU forensic lab (in their report that hasn’t been released yet) claims to have demonstrated that the WH BC image is cobbled together from a specific BC of another identified person and not an adoption related modification, so this would be a forgery, if true.
Mike Zullo said Arpaio would be releasing some new information and hopefully new evidence as soon as the Sheriff’s legal situation was settled. I hope Arpaio doesn’t keel over from the stress!
Everything I know about fabricated BCs I learned from you. Do you agree with the premise that Obama’s LFBC is either legal under the, ‘fabricated to cover an adoption,’ rubric, or do you think it is illegal, but the person [Fuddy] best able to make that case is conveniently dead?
Seize, I need to correct an error in my post. Neal Palafox was only the nominee for HI Health Director. Then all of a sudden Palafox was asked to withdraw as the nominee, and was smeared with brazen lies in the process. The lies served the purpose of keeping people from wondering if Palafox’ abrupt, forced withdrawal had anything to do with Obama (it did).
DL, I answered my own question. If a court ordered a fabricated BC for Obama, Palafox would have had no issue with it. However, the crooks in HI were putting out the lie that this was Obama’s vault copy. It wasn’t, and evidently there was reason to believe Palafox would not represent it as such.
Fuddy, of course, couldn’t wait to authenticate the fabrication. She was a ‘team player.’ She likely didn’t realize that the team she threw in with was actually the Deep State.