“Depts of health routinely issue cut and paste LFBCs in cases of adoption. In that sense what Obama has is not, strictly speaking, a forgery.”
Sheriff Arpaio says the EU forensic lab (in their report that hasn’t been released yet) claims to have demonstrated that the WH BC image is cobbled together from a specific BC of another identified person and not an adoption related modification, so this would be a forgery, if true.
Mike Zullo said Arpaio would be releasing some new information and hopefully new evidence as soon as the Sheriff’s legal situation was settled. I hope Arpaio doesn’t keel over from the stress!
I don’t think we disagree. There was no LFBC on file for obama. The one they cut and pasted contains info that goes well beyond the notation that was in Obama’s file.
The question is if Fuddy certifies it, is it legal or not? My understanding is that it’s legal. Were she alive, she could probably be induced to testify that she shouldn’t have certified it. But that’s out because she’s kaput.
At most what you’ll get would be HI officials testifying that they make substitute LFBCs routinely. They aren’t considered forgeries. Fuddy was key to documenting that this one exceeded their usual cut and paste parameters. How you prove it was not standard issue, legal fabrication of a LFBC I wouldn’t know.
I thought of a clearer way to express this. Namely, the LFBC is a fabrication—fact. If it’s a legal fabrication, then it’s not a forgery per se [though it would look like one to anybody who doesn’t know how LFBCs are typically fabricated].
Afaik, Fuddy was the best means of establishing whether the LFBC was legally or illegally fabricated. This is why she’s dead.
The question is whether a work-around exists. I.e.: whether anyone else would know if the fabrication was illegal. On that point, Idk.