My training and inclination is to let the hard forensic evidence unfold, just as Sheriff Arpaio and Zullo are trying to do.
First step is prove in a court of law or before another “trier of fact” that Barry’s BC is a forgery where the “opposition” can present a defense of its authenticity. We have an adversarial court system for a reason!
If Barry’s BC is proved to be a forgery, which I believe it will be, then the explosion of interest in where he was born will erupt and new forensic evidence will emerge, I expect, and we won’t have to speculate, as and/or frustrating as that is.
I grasp your inclination, but it’s not going to happen. Here’s why. Stanley Ann was sent to Vancouver to deliver and then relinquish her baby. She threw a wrench in the works when she insisted on keeping him.
Madelyn Dunham returned to HI [there is strong evidence for this in the CCP’s findings] and set about securing US citizenship for her grandson. She succeeded in registering some kind of birth—almost certainly a home birth—and this in turn generated the birth announcements.
This is why, as Tim Adams (among others) confirmed, no BC was on file in HI for Obama. This is also why Obama’s SS# can’t pass e-verify. Granny’s fake registration didn’t generate an official SS#.
Governor Abercrombie summed it up when he stated there was a notation in the file, something, ‘written down’. It was ‘evidence,’ if one didn’t dig too deeply, of a HI birth. (Others mentioned Obama’s “handwritten records,” also. That’s all there was originally.)
There was no impediment between these handwritten records and the issuance of a Certificate of Live Birth. If there was a registered home birth, there was a live birth, so no one batted an eye about putting that record out in public.
The LFBC was more problematic. It required information not included in the handwritten records. You may recall the trumped up charges against HI Health Director Dr. Neal Palafox, which resulted in his abrupt departure. He was replaced by a non-dr, Fuddy. She was happy to approve the LFBC with the added information. Then she conveniently died.
Depts of health routinely issue cut and paste LFBCs in cases of adoption. In that sense what Obama has is not, strictly speaking, a forgery. It’s a far cry from the original handwritten notes, but it’s probably legal. Or if not, then the person best positioned to make that case no longer can; she’s dead.
I believe the truth will eventually come out. But as to a forgery per se, that may not materialize. If that makes sense?