Nope. Creation threads can be expected to have Jesus. Science threads cannot be left unmolested.
Why can’t science threads coexist with creation threads? Even if we figure which molecules went where when, doesn’t mean God didn’t start the chain reaction. Doesn’t mean he did. I don’t how the heck anyone can prove the eistance/non-existence of God in a science lab. But that doesn’t mean faith and science can’t get along. Just render unto Caesar, scientifically speaking. :-)
Since you bring it up, just how does “science” know the conditions that were present “at the time the earth was formed”?
Just what body of knowledge provided that mystical insights? Oh, wait, a myriad of assumptions, based on a theory that cannot be tested to derive at test methodology tat cannot be validated to explore an outcome that can never be repeated... Oh, that “science” err I mean “religious” belief.....
“Religion”- a method of assembling concepts together to arrive at complete end state, as compared to “analysis”- the breaking down of components to arrive at singleness.
Fact is, my religious belief that God Almighty formed the universe with simply His voice and will is just as complete as the opposing idea that “ it just had to come into existence” without regard to reason, per the chief priest of “science” Mssr Hawkings....
However, on the one hand, reason demands that there must be cause and effect- one cannot just enjoy an effect while ignoring the requirement for a cause- the universe itself cannot be both cause ( since it did not exist) and effect (now that it exists).
School kids know that Johnny had to throw the ball in order for Rex go fetch it..., and they cannot vote. Meanwhile adults reject that logic out of hand and they can vote!
.
“Science threads” are an attempt to molest reality!
.