Doesn’t answer the question of whether he Cosby-ed her.
I wonder if she has any money. Seems like enough here to give him a pretty strong malicious prosecution case. To him, though, I’d point out that hook up culture isn’t always everything it’s cracked up to be.
The story as reported doesn’t really help determine if he was guilty. The claim was that either she was too drunk to consent, or, as the charge indicated, he drugged her.
The way the drugs work, they don’t make you pass out, it’s not like you have to carry the drugged person out of the bar.
And the video doesn’t clearly show that she is not drunk. ANd if she was drunk, or drugged, it should not make any difference if she was the “instigator”. Of course, if he drugged her, the whole point would be to get to that end game, and if he looked reluctant, that would be an act.
Now, it didn’t look from the clips that she was all that drunk. Since there’s a person where she signed in, I’d like to hear what they said about her state.
But the date rape drug could well present this way. I don’t know if they had any evidence at all that such a drug was used, and I’m certainly not saying I think he is guilty. Just that I’m not sure the video makes me dismiss the case without hearing other evidence.
I’d like to hear from her friend, who was interacting with her. Is making obscene gestures a normal thing, or is it a sign of drunken stupor? Did the guy at the desk think she was about to pass out? Is there any evidence the guy had purchased date rape drugs, and sign of them in her system?
But that carries no weight in the bizarre star chamber of campus Title IX proceedings. He is still at risk.
‘Regret rape’.
Ping.
So if the guy didn’t rape her, why is her identity still shielded and her face on the video blurred?
In this day and age why are we still hiding the identity of the women. How is that constitutional. If he murdered her we would know her name. If he beat her we would know her name. But if she accuses him of rape she is protected. That is clearly assumed guilt. And she is assumed innocent. We should be long past the time where women are protected from the stain of being raped. Especially when they are false accusers.
Interesting how they show the face of the victim -ie in this case the male falsely accused of a horrible crime - but they black out the face of the guilty one - the woman who lied and tried to ruin the guy’s life.
Imagine if the gender roles were reversed. Does anyone think they would show the victim’s face if the victim were a woman?