[C19fan]

No wonder Homo Sapiens are so obsessed with sex. Our ancestors would grab anything walking on two legs.

[mountainlion]

This is not science but conjecture and theory. Where is the data on the steps of the scientific method.

[adorno]

Interbred? How so?

If early Homo Sapiens bred with others, and they produced others, then, they were of the same “species”, meaning, they were all of the human species. Never mind calling the Neanderthals or Denisovans or Africans or whatever; they were all of the same species of animals.

[Red Badger]

They still do!...................

[Jeff Chandler]

Our ancestors would grab anything walking on two legs.

.

[central_va]

She's a hottie.

[dfwgator]

That means we’re all African-Americans.

Where’s my reparations?

[proxy_user]

If these scientists desire a wild melee in which SJWs go on the attack, this sort of thing would probably set it off.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

How is this possible? I was taught that two different species, even though close enough to produce offspring, the offspring will be sterile.
Horse+donkey= sterile mule.
Cow+bison= sterile cattlow.

[Wuli]

The total sum of the two sets of discoveries - interbreeding in Eurasia and now in sub-Saharan Africa, suggests that just like homosapiens, early hominids also migrated widely on earth.

[pabianice]

>>Given the rate that genes mutate during the course of evolution, Dr. Gokcumen and co-authors calculated that the ancestors of Sub-Saharan Africans interbred with the ‘ghost’ hominin species as recently as 150,000 years ago, after the two species’ evolutionary path diverged from each other some 1.5 to 2 million years ago.

Hmmm. Didn't the Battlestar Galactica crew come to Earth 150,000 years ago?

[Boogieman]

Well, if they interbred with humans, the obvious conclusion is that these weren’t “archaic hominim species” they were interbreeding with, but simply other races of humans that have since gone extinct.