Like I said, I don’t think he should have been in the US in the first place, as his cult is anathema to our founding principles.
But people are just ravening to find that this was some kind of muslim jihad and are not taking into account that Noor was background checked and psychologically screened, thus reducing the chance that his religious belief system would run counter to his statutory obligations.
Now, for the sake of argument, say his background and psychological profile was damaged AND he was hired over the objections of those officers and screeners whose duty it was to evaluate and report on such, then the ELECTED officials who so enthusiastically endorsed Noor should be exposed.
And indicted.
MOLON... please do not be a MORON...
Do not use white bread assumptions on what has many sights and smells of rotten rye.
Who knows WHAT was sacrificed for the so called “background” and “psychological profile” screening. If it wasn’t already systematically weak.
This is the kind of thing that makes police “apologists” look quite sorry!
And that last sentence of excuse making is inexcusable.
Like you can’t EVER hold a malice case responsible? Even if the government missed it? The government didn’t shoot! He did!
Noor was background checked and psychologically screened
____________________________________
LOL
obviously not in the way you think he was...
I can’t tell with the ravenous frenzy if I’m witnessing educated arguments or an emotional tirade on full display. I haven’t yet heard him make any proclamations to Jihad, his history doesn’t point to that or any violence in the name of Islam. Thus far the only thing proven is that it was a careless shooting for now with more to come out.
This incessant need to make it more than it is in the present is ideaology and that is just as dangerous as Muslim fanatisism. I agree with your points and they are reasoned.