Posted on 07/02/2017 7:01:16 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Warnings to the United States are being issued by the globalist leech in charge at the UN, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. On Tuesday, the open borders communist operative cautioned President Trump that we could be replaced. We should be so fortunate and ought to, in fact, work to help guarantee that happens. There must be plenty of countries around the world ready to take on the “developing nations” as national dependents, though they may have to “sweeten the deal” with a little slave labor or territory, something that isn’t presently required.
Guterres told reporters at his first press conference since taking over the UN on January 1st, that the new funding levels proposed by the United States would be disastrous and create, “an unsolvable problem to the management of the U.N.” Can it be possible there is a problem that the globalists can’t solve? How obvious has it become that their “problem solving” is based solely upon the model of throwing American money at a problem? If the cash flow is restricted they can’t function.
Guterres, who was previously in charge of the UN’s global human trafficking operations as United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, boasts of his willingness to engage in confrontations with the America-first President. He brags about his vocal opposition to America’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Welfare scam as if opposing what ultimately took place is in itself some sort of victory. It’s called losing, Antonio. Grasping at face-saving straws, he said the Democrats’ empty promises to act in place of the federal government are “a signal of hope that we very much encourage.” That “signal of hope” and ten bucks will get you a cup of water with free Wi-Fi at Starbucks, Guterres.
(Excerpt) Read more at rickwells.us ...
Vacate the NY building
Doesn't conform to Obama era EPA regulations
Sorry..the GOPe and dims prevented me from abolishing the regs
Have a nice day.
That approach works for me.
Do I amoose you!
Time to meander from the “familiarity breeds contempt” rule to the “absence makes the heart grow fonder” rule.
the new funding levels proposed by the United States would be disastrous and create, “an unsolvable problem to the management of the U.N.”
I see no problem with this.
Yes!
As a side note: I grew up in New York city and use to deliver food to the UN and the ambassadors condos. Think of how the Queen of England lives and multiply it by a 1000 and you may get somewhat close to how these sc*mbags live. For example I once delivered 50 five gallon bottles of spring water (up two flights of stairs after getting of the elevator) to the ambassador of Ghana because he didn’t want to use tap water to bathe and guess who paid for it? This is Ghana which regularly scams millions from elderly people in the USA, that is all they have EVER done for the USA. And BTW - If you have elderly parents or ones that are naive about the internet, PLEASE sit them down and talk to them about the scams. I’ve seen so many lives of the elderly destroyed from that sh*t its insane. People who have worked hard all their lives for 50 - 60 years only to see it all ripped off by these f**kin n-s from Ghana, and they ARE n-s. This guy right here, he’s one of the leaders, the “Don” of these scam gangs. He makes millions scamming people through the internet, has thousands of people working for him and he flaunts it.
https://www.facebook.com/rasdonskele
Go for it. Morons.
....the new funding levels proposed by the United States would be disastrous and create, “an unsolvable problem to the management of the U.N...
Greatest news for the USA.
Go for it, UN. But, do it elsewhere. This anti-American rogue POS organization needs to die out. It’s not much different from the league of nations. People are not 100% compatible with others, and especially with others that wish to kill them.
Nobody threatens MY country.
Get the H*** out. Go to Europe.
The following figures are from memory, for who pays for the UN:
US 25% (veto)
Japan 10%
China 8% (veto)
Germany: 5%
UK 3% (veto)
France 3% (veto)
Brazil 2%
Italy 2%
Russia 2% (veto)
India 1%
The UN is a joke. It’s 180 countries shaking us down. On climate change, on peacekeeping missions, you name it.
Ditto NATO.
If the UN and if NATO were fair, countries would vote in proportion to their contribution. And, no country should have a veto power just because they were on the winning side during WWII (or, in the case of France, because we felt sorry for them).
Those who pay the piper should call the tune.
Cough up a hairball, Mr Secretary.
Vacate your NYC headquarters immediately. May I suggest something in down town Racca?
PS years ago NATO hdg was on island of Malta. They decided they didn’t want to be a target so the Maltese kicked then out. There’s a lesson to be learned here.
I disagree, they are the enemy within. The sooner they’re out of our country, the better. The UN has long since outlived its usefulness, and turned into a global government think tank.
I guess Secretary-General Antonio Guterres can’t solve this matter by having a Clinton give a couple of $500,000 speeches.
I would have the bulldozers with logging chain stationed right outside the front door July the 5th and start tearing that eyesore down.
Should be cheap in Caracas and PLENTY OF FREE PARKING...LOL
Yep. We have Wilson to thank for this monster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.