Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

She wanted to hang on to insure that her replacement was picked by “the first woman president”.

Can you provide a source for that?


It “seems obvious upon casual observation” to me. Many others have come to the same conclusion.

Here is a strong hint in a Slate article.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/07/08/ruth_bader_ginsburg_would_let_hillary_clinton_replace_her_on_the_supreme.html


114 posted on 06/24/2017 5:18:08 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

When asked about the possibility of Donald Trump assuming the presidency instead, Ginsburg responded, “I don’t want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs.” The justice then acknowledged that the future of the court will be decided by the next president:

“It’s likely that the next president, whoever she will be, will have a few appointments to make,” Ginsburg said with a smile.


Bwhaahahahaha!!!!


127 posted on 06/24/2017 10:37:24 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson